The graph below gives information from 1 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
The graph show information from 2008 announce about spending of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030.
It is clear that consumption energy has increased significantly from 1980 to 2030. While hydropower energy high but in 2030 has lowest.
Look at the graph. It can be seen that rated consumption of energy in the hydropower is the lowest among 6 segments with a figure of 4 quadrillion in 1980 but this figure down to about 3 quadrillion. Meanwhile, has 35 quadrillion of used energy in the petrol oil, but in 2030 highest ten percent have number is 45 quadrillion.
The energy consumption relatively stable and tends to increase slowly, in 1980 have number lowest is nuclear and sola, wind is 4 quadrillion. But to in 2010 that number increased but much lower than other energies with figure of 5 quadrillion. With coal energy is 16 quadrillion but in 2030 has highest significantly is 25 quadrillion, finally with natural gas in 1980 is 20 quadrillion but in 2030 increased second only to coal energy is 23 quadrillion. So, it can be seen hat people in the USA consume the most energy in petrol and oil or coal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Ahmad_off | 61 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-06-19 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-17 | neverlandforestcat | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-10 | brew | 78 | view |
- Many people use written language in a less formal way and in a relaxed way than in the past Why is that so Does the development have more advantages 73
- Nowadays most people try to balance between work and other parts of their lives Unfortunately not many achieve this balance What are the problems with this Suggest some solutions to solve the problems 84
- The table shows the information of total health expenditure per capita in five countries in 2019 73
- The best way to produce a happier society is to ensure that there are only small differences between the richest and poorest member To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Despite the increased access to education a significant number of people cannot read or write What are the disadvantages and what action should the government take 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, if, look, second, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 939.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.71859296482 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87659365233 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497487437186 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 271.8 283.868780488 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 54.0773520062 43.030603864 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.9 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.1 5.23603664747 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.361813574888 0.215688989381 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.17424650966 0.103423049105 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170921254511 0.0843802449381 203% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.312501506465 0.15604864568 200% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.200826094622 0.0819641961636 245% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 13.2329268293 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.04 8.06136585366 87% => OK
difficult_words: 31.0 40.7170731707 76% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.