Students learn far more with their teachers than from other sources (Internet or television). To what extend do you agree or disagree?
It is argued that young people gain knowledge better with their instructors than other sources (Internet or television). I totally concur with this viewpoint for some reasons.
To begin with, teachers have professional expertise that help students to summarize and simplify the knowledge. As the result, learners can access the knowledge easier. When students take part in offline classes, if they have any questions, they can raise their hand and ask the teacher immediately. If students learn from Internet or television, it is hardly likely that their questions will be addressed. Moreover, instructors can be motivators who stimulating students in their education. Sometimes teacher can be a parent showing students moral lessons in life such as sharing and tolerance. For these reasons, teachers have a profound impact on students' education.
However, some people believe that other sources can replace instructors and teach students well. This is true, to some extent, but it should be borne in mind that exposure to enormous knowledge does not guarantee an excellent student. By constrast, students will confused with too much information which they are accessed. Students, especially these with limited learning capacity, need a real teacher, who can instruct them give them feedback on their performance and help them to understand complicated theories.
In conclusion, I believe teachers are still indispensable roles regardless of the developed technology.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-05-28 | _Ha Phuong | 56 | view |
2015-06-25 | stickwitu | 87 | view |
- Some people argue that job satisfaction is more important than job security while others believe that they cannot always expect job satisfaction and a permanent job is more important Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
- Students learn far more with their teachers than from other sources Internet or television To what extend do you agree or disagree 56
- The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 650, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...ons, teachers have a profound impact on students education. However, some people believ...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'will' requires the base form of the verb: 'confuse'
Suggestion: confuse
...nt student. By constrast, students will confused with too much information which they ar...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, moreover, so, still, well, in conclusion, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 20.0 41.998997996 48% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1246.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 223.0 315.596192385 71% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.58744394619 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 4.20363070211 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88410887717 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 176.041082164 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.636771300448 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 369.9 506.74238477 73% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.9111233331 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.0 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.9285714286 20.7667163134 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.85714285714 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259450318692 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898300682335 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.05980406428 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147139503571 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646175805375 0.056905535591 114% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 50.2224549098 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.34 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.