Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Telephone has more effects on people s lives than television does

Essay topics:

Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Telephone has more effects on people’s lives than television does.

Most people believe that television has a great impact on daily life. However, I consider it a misunderstanding. Actually, people of different ages have different answers to the question. Young people, generation Z, especially, rely on phones much more than on TV, while older people are more likely to be influenced by TV rather than by cell phones.
Most young people cannot live without cell phones, but they will not feel the same about television. The young are either studying at school or working at the company, so they will have to get connected with their classmates, teacher, friends, or bosses. Missing an important phone call or text message might be unacceptable to young people, because they may miss a critical event or a working opportunity. However, most young people do not watch TV frequently. Two main reasons for people watching TV are to acquire information and to entertain, and it is obvious that the young have better ways to get the information they need and more exciting ways to have fun. Young people prefer to acquire information on the internet if they want to learn things, for the information on the internet is more accurate and updated. For entertainment, young people usually go to bars or play sports, for that cell phones are also indispensable to make an appointment and pay the bill. Young people's lives relies heavily on cell phones, yet television never plays an important role in their daily life.
For older people, the cell phone is no longer a daily activity but watching TV almost happens every day. Aged people no longer work, nor do they go to school. So there is no need for them to touch many people frequently. The only people they want to contact are their family members, who come back home regularly. Furthermore, older people would prefer to talk face to face rather than communicate through the cell phone, for sometimes, they cannot hear clearly on the phone. On the contrary, TV seems to be the best friend and companion to most elderly people. It helps them get in touch with the world and kill too much leisure time. Most elderly people do not surf the internet to get information, thus TV programs are supposed to be the best way for them to know what is happening around the globe. Since they have a whole day to spend at home alone if their children are working in companies or studying at school, watching TV programs serves as a time-killing activity with which they will not feel lonely and bored. For older people, a wonderful TV set is much more important than a smartphone.
It is obvious that people with different expectations will have different choices. The influences of the TV and cell phones may differ as users' ages change.

Votes
Average: 7 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-05-31 tiak 70 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78205128205 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61695528503 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472222222222 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2095857871 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150584131065 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525715130406 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388049100166 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107897317233 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387488750844 0.0645574589148 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, so, thus, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 15.1003584229 119% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 9.8082437276 122% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 11.0286738351 54% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 26.0 43.0788530466 60% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 52.1666666667 98% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.0752688172 111% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2238.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 468.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78205128205 4.8611393121 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65116196802 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61695528503 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 221.0 212.727598566 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472222222222 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 680.4 618.680645161 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.59856630824 42% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 4.94265232975 40% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2095857871 48.9658058833 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.25 100.406767564 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.6045352989 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.45110844103 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.85842293907 233% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150584131065 0.236089414692 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0525715130406 0.076458572812 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0388049100166 0.0737576698707 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107897317233 0.150856017488 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387488750844 0.0645574589148 60% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.8 11.7677419355 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 10.9000537634 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.28 8.01818996416 91% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 86.8835125448 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:

para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.

So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:

reasons == advantages or

reasons == disadvantages

for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.

or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.


Rates: 70.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.