Group or team activities can teach more important skills for life than those activities which are done alone.
Do you agree or disagree?
There has been a colossal upsurge in discussing whether team activities or individual activities play vital role in our life. Although both activities bring us particular benefits for any facets, I personally give a green light to the team activities and will discuss my rational opinion in the following paragraph.
To be clear, it is hardly unaccepted that teamwork makes astonishing merit to our daily life. First of all, it helps us ameliorate our communicating skill and listening skills. It is evident that partaking in a team can give us more chances to observe people's strategies once working. Secondly, it can help us know the way to collaborate and cooperate with each other, which can increase productivity effectively. For instance, in a current survey in the US, most of the students assume that partaking in a team can give them effort and enjoy a working atmosphere so as to reach our initial target. Thirdly, without support from the team, we hardly shoulder all responsibilities in a project which can deter our aspiration for work.
It is stated that most developed nations apply the teamwork method in all processes. Perhaps the best example of this would be Japan where most of us had witnessed terrible destruction after World War 2. Thanks to putting teamwork skills directly into a recovery operation, this nation gain a tremendous achievement in the industry, education, economy, etc, and become one of the most powerful nations in the ranks across the globe. However, individual work doesn't mean leading to far-reaching negative effects on our working or learning path. To be precise, teamwork does not always exist in every situation, self-performing sometimes helps us gain stupendous success. It is undoubtedly that running together can rarely avoid conflict. Moreover, it is some inequivalence in assigning workload to all members in a group. Finally, individual performance forces us aware of our capability and not rely heavily on someone else.
In conclusion, the advantageous meaning of teamwork or individual performance can not be denied. If we know the operate these skills in the right circumstances, work may become more and more efficient and effective Nevertheless, I wholehearted incline to the idea that the advantages we earn from teamwork are more than other solutions.
- Some people think that hosting an international sports event is good for the country while some people think it is bad Discuss both views and state your opinion 56
- To meet the growing needs of food for the increasing population country should make use of edible insects as foods However some people believe that insects are not only unhealthy but affect negatively the nature too What are the benefits and drawbacks of 67
- Some people think that we should divide students based on their academic ability while others think we should educate all students together Discuss both views and give your opinion 93
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year 61
- Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for some but may also have a negative impact on others To what extent is this style of management eff 74
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 565, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...m effort and enjoy a working atmosphere so as to reach our initial target. Thirdly, with...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 459, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...oss the globe. However, individual work doesnt mean leading to far-reaching negative e...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...rformance can not be denied. If we know the operate these skills in the right circumstances...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, however, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, as to, for instance, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1951.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 372.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24462365591 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39173103935 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03395795218 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602150537634 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 617.4 506.74238477 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 5.43587174349 202% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8047571553 49.4020404114 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.388888889 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.06120827912 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195307918723 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0568962519591 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0548713845228 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125531774646 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0692074573616 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.