The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:
A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
The argument made by a faculty committee to give a free tuition to the college-age children of the faculty of the Seatown University. However, the argument are many flaws in the argument. The committee have not provided proofs to the argument.
The committee has to be specific while asking for the free education for their children. They have not count the current professors who have their children studying in the same college. This decision needs to be taken with proper analysis. They must show the president the proper data.According to my experience with the education field , the amount of the fee is about 10-15 % of the salary of the professor. If a professor have a college-age student studying in the same university , it is equal to giving that much of salary hike in the professor's salary.
Moreover the reason behind asking for the free education is not appropriate. The argument on the basis of the retention of the professor is baseless. What if the professor are not from local city ?. their students will not do graduation from the same university. they might choose the local university. The committee should collect more data before asking for the free cost education.
This will not apply to the professors who does not have a college aged or no children. So more data required on how much new professor the university hires every year who have college-age children. Along with that , this decision is important in the aspects of the money. It should not affect the other students fees too. They must present a data which can convince the president in taking the decision. They also present a data which proves that the retention of the professors will actually going to benefit the university.
Therefor, It con be concluded that the committee must present the data which have proper information regarding the currant situation they have. So that the decision can be taken easily.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-08 | Keerthi98 | 33 | view |
| 2019-12-02 | Opak Pulu | 58 | view |
| 2019-10-31 | solankis304 | 63 | view |
| 2019-10-16 | Deepali24 | 69 | view |
| 2019-10-14 | Siddhivinayak Shanbhagd | 49 | view |
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society. 50
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals. Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 40
- The following appeared in a letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University:A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for thei 50
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting, lethargy, and other signs of illness. After the recall, the pet food company tested samples from the recalled foo 20
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through large 50
If a professor have
If a professor has
-------------------
argument 1 -- not OK. You can't use your own experience.
argument 2 and argument 3 are similar.
--------------------
read a sample:
http://www.testbig.com/gmatgre-argument-task-essays/following-appeared-…
-------------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 2.5 out of 6
Category: Poor Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 20 15
No. of Words: 321 350
No. of Characters: 1546 1500
No. of Different Words: 139 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.233 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.816 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.538 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 83 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 67 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 40 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 16.05 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 6.289 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.45 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.323 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.538 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.083 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5