The two maps compare the differences in layout of Grance park in 1920 and today.It can be clearly seen that there were many dramatically changes in that period including the demolishing and addition of the buildings.
By the year 1920, there was a Fountain in the centre of the park. To the west of the Fountain is where the Stage for musicians was located. In the top right corner was a Pond for water plants. The Glasshouse was located in the bottom right corner. Besides, there were five Seats and three Rose gardens at that time.
By this day, the amount of Rose gardens was decreased. There are now only two Rose gardens, one in the top left corner near Amphitheatre for concerts which was replaced the Stage for musicians, one located in the centre of the park where the Fountain was and surrounded by four Seats. Furthermore, the Pond for water plants was demolished to make way for a Children’s play area, next to it is a Café. In the bottom right corner where the Glasshouse was now places the Water feature area. There is addition of the Underground car park so besides the two old entrances without changes, there is a new Entrance for the car park.
All in all, the park has been changed and upgraded a lot since 1920.
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country in millions 67
- the plans below show a public park when it was first opened in 1920 and the same park today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The table below shows the television viewing figures for sports by country in millions 67
- The chart shows the average number of hours each day that Chinese American Turkish and Brazilian tourists spent doing leisure activities while on holiday in Greece in August 2019 73
- The graph shows the number of visitors to four international museums between 1980 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 81, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: It
...layout of Grance park in 1920 and today.It can be clearly seen that there were man...
^^
Line 2, column 184, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...he top right corner was a Pond for water plants. The Glasshouse was located in th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, furthermore, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 7.0 257% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1016.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 223.0 196.424390244 114% => OK
Chars per words: 4.55605381166 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.45466444678 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.511210762332 0.547539520022 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 304.2 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 8.94146341463 134% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 59.4843583549 43.030603864 138% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.6666666667 112.824112599 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5833333333 22.9334400587 81% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191696007457 0.215688989381 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782297322972 0.103423049105 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487643704693 0.0843802449381 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.117258133822 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218460233448 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.3 13.2329268293 70% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.17 11.4140731707 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 11.4329268293 57% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 7.0 11.0658536585 63% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.