The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The given table sheds lights on the expenditure distribution of consumers in 5 different nations, namely Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey in 2002.
As can be seen from the table, citizens in all mentioned countries spent most of their money in Food/Drinks/Tobacco while expenditure for Leisure&Education activities made up the least with just around 1.98% to 4.35% depend on each countries.
When it comes to the Food, Beverages and Tobacco sections, consumers from Turkey and Ireland were among the top buyers on the ground that approximately a third of their expenditure went to these types of goods, with the former accounted for 32.14% and 28.91% for the latter. The others' spending were significantly lighter, varied from 15.77% to 18.8%.
Considering the figures for Clothes&Footwear, Italians spent up to 9% of their budget on this category, followed by Turkey, Spain, Ireland and Sweden.
With regard to expenditure on Leisure&Education activities, it is clear that people from all mentioned nations spared the least of their income on this sector, made up less than 5% of their total spending, with the highest went to Turkey (4.35%) and Spain bottomed out the list at 1.98%.
Surprisingly, in terms of the total expenditure for three sectors, those from Turkey spent up to 43.12% of their income, nearly double that of Swedish (24.39%)
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-30 | Ahmad_off | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2023-01-26 | Nguyễn Thạch Bảo Ngọc | view | |
| 2022-08-03 | rachell | 56 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | nhattram39 | 11 | view |
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 11
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 11
- Some people believe that pop stars deserve to earn more money than classical music performers Some disagree Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The graphs below show the cinema attendance in Australia and the average cinema visits by different age groups from 1996 to 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, third, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 5.60731707317 268% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 48.0 33.7804878049 142% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1147.0 965.302439024 119% => OK
No of words: 218.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26146788991 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84250218741 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07753042263 2.65546596893 116% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 106.607317073 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596330275229 0.547539520022 109% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 283.868780488 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 71.4711301784 43.030603864 166% => OK
Chars per sentence: 163.857142857 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.1428571429 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.28571428571 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 3.83414634146 156% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0469250181272 0.215688989381 22% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0299299480189 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0472848311639 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.031525190146 0.15604864568 20% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0507675065002 0.0819641961636 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.9 13.2329268293 143% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.47 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.3012195122 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.82 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.09 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 40.7170731707 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.