In some countries, people encourage students to find part-time jobs while some people don't. Discuss both sides and give your opinion.
Preventing students from graduating on time is the primary reason why many avoid persuading students to have side jobs. While some agree, that having a part-time job is the better option for helping students to acquire soft skills.
Some do not recommend students to do a part-time job concerning the delayed graduation since they are more preoccupied with work responsibilities than those coming from school. This leads to students being unable to concentrate and would need to prioritize one more than the others. For instance, around half of exchange students from Bangladesh who went abroad for job training in the US in 2019 had their undergraduate thesis postponed to focus on the programs. Since the delayed graduation leads to a bad stigma on the student’s CV, many parents do not recommend each other to let their children take such programs in the future. However, having side jobs also allows students to acquire experience and skills.
The acquisition of soft skills is why many encourage students to apply for a part-time job, helping students to get hired easier after graduating. More specifically, being in a workplace allows students to get used to being collaborative and responsible, which adds to the students’ confidence when interviewing for job applications. For example, 3 to 4 shortlisted candidates at BCG are known to have several part-time jobs at school. The HR says the way they carried out themselves during the interviews reflects their confidence as they are familiar with a workplace situation. Thus, applying for a part-time job is still encouraged by some people.
In conclusion, although many people do not recommend students to have side jobs, some still do as it facilitates students to develop soft skills. If possible, including job training in the school curriculum is necessary.
- The table shows the expense of used bookstore in Scotland for the first time and last month of the same year 73
- The bar graph below shows the stock price of four different technology companies from 2011 to 2016 61
- The graph below shows how people buy music Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In many countries schools have several problems with student s behaviour What do you think are causes of this what solutions can you suggest 73
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, so, still, thus, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 294.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.24829931973 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99043819961 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.551020408163 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1264955377 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.214285714 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.06120827912 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27164684199 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108376208573 0.084324248473 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0779186217842 0.0667982634062 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.189906754296 0.151304729494 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345898169976 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.