Some children spend hours every day on their smartphones.
Why is this the case? Do you think this is a positive or a negative development?
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Opinions diverge on why children spend hours every day using smartphones. The reasons for this practice are children’s curiosity and the popularity of online games, which is considered a negative movement dramatically affecting children's growth.
Admittedly, the interest of students in the outside world and the booming of distinct types of virtual games are the main reasons that make them dependent on phones. When it comes to the former ground, this can be explained by the fact that humans live in the development environment where innovative technology is conducive for young people to explore the magnificence of the earth. Videos, articles or blogs on the internet may revolutionize children’s understanding without having real experience; therefore, they are inclined to use phones for several hours continuously to satisfy their curiosity. Regarding games which attract the youth, the visual image and the audio in virtual games are catchy enough to make children stick their eyes on the phone screen for hours. By that, the time they spend on phones surges considerably.
It is woeful that excessive cell phone use can affect children in negative ways. In terms of health issues, being addicted to phones makes young people imagine themselves as characters in the game or film so it leaps the chance to get autism. The reason is that they spend less time socializing with others; however, they prefer to talk to themselves as a symptom of mental illness. Further and even more importantly, the awareness of children about the real life may become exhausted. Now that the source of information they approach in a wrong way, the threat of over-using phones can affect children's growth in society.
By way of conclusion, the negative movement in over-depending on smartphones due to users’ curiosity and game addiction is transparent to observe.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-27 | ophongcute@gmail.com | 89 | view |
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar chart below shows the numbers of men and women attending various evening courses at an adult education centre in the year 2009 The pie chart gives information about the ages of these course participants 89
- The chart below gives information about southland s main exports in 2000 2021 and future projections for 2025 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The maps below show the changes that have taken place at the waterfront area of a town called Darwin between 2009 and 2014 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West Park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selectin and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 126, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'phone'.
Suggestion: phone
...rms of health issues, being addicted to phones makes young people imagine themselves a...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a wrong way" with adverb for "wrong"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...the source of information they approach in a wrong way, the threat of over-using phones can af...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, regarding, so, therefore
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1566.0 1615.20841683 97% => OK
No of words: 297.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27272727273 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15134772569 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89900749652 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.589225589226 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 485.1 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.283865598 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.461538462 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8461538462 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169315105426 0.244688304435 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0625862790045 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0547919590568 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.115574029101 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0799361318831 0.056905535591 140% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 12.4159519038 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.51 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.