The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources

Given is the line graph delineating the proportion of worldwide citizens receiving news in 4 distinct ways in a 25-year period, commencing from 1995 to 2020 and giving predictions for the next 5 years.
It is perceptible that the rate of people reaching news by TV, Newspaper and Radio still shares a slumping pattern while the opposite is likely to be true for the rest - internet.
From 1995 to 2020, the proportion of news-takers by television, newspaper as well as radio diminished over the years. Specifically, the rate of people accessing news from television from the highest rate of 70% moderated to somewhere at 55% in 2020. Likewise, the number of people using newspaper and radio in the rate started at approximately 58% and 52% before plummeting at nearly 22% and 30% respectively. Meanwhile people in 1995 barely used the internet, they swelled in rate in the vicinity of 30% in 2010 and made a remarkable rush to second place in the rank chart of the most accessors to news in 4 different categories.
For the year in the future, the projections for the rate of citizens gaining news from 4 sources in the future register a moderate fluctuation in position. To be more accurate, the netizens approaching news is supposed to have by far the highest rate, followed by a plateau in rank of TV, newspaper and radio with 50%, 30% and 20% in turn.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (2 votes)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng news by TV, Newspaper and Radio still shares a slumping pattern while the oppo...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ing at nearly 22% and 30% respectively. Meanwhile people in 1995 barely used the internet...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, so, still, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75423728814 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86173016653 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.368001174 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246396230616 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109156440272 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631980451106 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137324760582 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409549747028 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 89, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ng news by TV, Newspaper and Radio still shares a slumping pattern while the oppo...
^^
Line 3, column 410, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Meanwhile,
...ing at nearly 22% and 30% respectively. Meanwhile people in 1995 barely used the internet...
^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, likewise, second, so, still, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 33.7804878049 145% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 965.302439024 116% => OK
No of words: 236.0 196.424390244 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.75423728814 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.73543355544 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86173016653 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.533898305085 0.547539520022 98% => OK
syllable_count: 338.4 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.368001174 43.030603864 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.25 112.824112599 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.5 22.9334400587 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 5.23603664747 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246396230616 0.215688989381 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109156440272 0.103423049105 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631980451106 0.0843802449381 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137324760582 0.15604864568 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0409549747028 0.0819641961636 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.7 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.96 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.2 10.3012195122 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.86 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.