The line graph shows the percentage of people accessing news from 4 sources.
Given is the line graph delineating the rate of people connecting news from 4 different devices, namely TV, newspaper, radio and internet over a course of time, commencing from 1995 to 2020 and giving projections for the year 2025.
It is predicted that netizents continuously leaps in rate to 2025, while the contrast is true for that of three remaining types of sources.
In some past years from 1995 to 2020, the rate of TV users plummeted from 70% to 59%, despite a slight upswing in 2010, it however still had the highest rate of people accessing. Newspapers and radio news-approaches shared a similar deflating trend when they contracted in percentage from 58% to approximately 30% for the former and from from 51% to roughly 21% for the latter. When it comes to the internet, before 1995, none of the people used the internet to access the news but from 2000 to 2020, that percentage of users proliferated to 40%.
It is envisioned that in 2025, the internet has by far the highest proportion of users with 56%, followed by that of TV with 50%. It seems that newspapers and radio are no longer popular in the future, only 30% and 21% registered in sequence.
- The diagram shows the design of a modern landfill for household waste Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The pie charts below show units of electricity production by fuel source in Australia and France in 1980 and 2000 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- The graph below shows the average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- As we are facing more and more problems which affect the whole planet good relationships between different countries are becoming more important than ever before To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- The maps below show the changes in an Art Centre from 2010 to today 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 333, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: from
...to approximately 30% for the former and from from 51% to roughly 21% for the latter. Whe...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ely 30% for the former and from from 51% to roughly 21% for the latter. When it c...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.15609756098 253% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 963.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.69756097561 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6882253666 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 106.607317073 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556097560976 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 38.676048592 43.030603864 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.571428571 112.824112599 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.2857142857 22.9334400587 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.85714285714 5.23603664747 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.260433334895 0.215688989381 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107345346804 0.103423049105 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101213035183 0.0843802449381 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.125045044104 0.15604864568 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.125636606408 0.0819641961636 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.2329268293 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.42 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.57 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.