The line graph shows the percentage of New Zealand population from 1950 and 2050
The line graph ilustrates the proportion of 4 different age groups of population from 1950 to 2050 in New Zealand.
It is clear that the number of people from 0-14 increased while over 65 and 25-37 dropped, the number of people from 38-45 flactuated over the period shown. The population growth of age over 65 was the highest figure while age 0-14 was the lowest figure. In addition, age 25-37 experienced the most significant change over that time.
In 1950, the number of people over 65 years old was the highest figure with 60%, followed by 35-48 ages comprised over 20%. The percentage of ages 25-37 was higher than the figure that of group 0-14 accounted 20% and 5% respectively, the percentage of people from 0-14 also was the lowest figure, only 1/12 of the higest figure.
In 2050, through many flactuation, the highest figure which was group over 65 will decrease, 5% off, accounting for 55%. The number of people from 35-48 years old will increase significantly with 38%, 18% higher than in 1950, this figure will in top 2. The number of people from 0-14 years old will be higher than the figure that of group 25-37 with almost 20% and 0% respectively.
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- The table below shows the percentages of mobile phone owners using various mobile phone features Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features make comparion where relevant 73
- The table and charts detailed below give information about the police budget in 2017 and 2018 in on area of Britain The table illustrates where the money came from and the charts show how it was distributed 82
- Many people are now spending more and more time travelling to work or school Some people believe that this is a negative development while others think there are some benefits Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
- The plans show the change of a small theater in 2010 and 2012 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was group over 65 will decrease, 5% off, accounting for 55%. The number of people...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68780487805 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41751491127 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458536585366 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8296385503 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183062147355 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103421054882 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158858070328 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191436608852 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.205756439409 0.0819641961636 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 101, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...was group over 65 will decrease, 5% off, accounting for 55%. The number of people...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 33.7804878049 115% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.68780487805 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41751491127 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 94.0 106.607317073 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.458536585366 0.547539520022 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 261.9 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.33902439024 207% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.8296385503 43.030603864 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7777777778 22.9334400587 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183062147355 0.215688989381 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103421054882 0.103423049105 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.158858070328 0.0843802449381 188% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191436608852 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.205756439409 0.0819641961636 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 74.53 61.2550243902 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.22 11.4140731707 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 6.96 8.06136585366 86% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.