In many workplaces, online communication is now more common than face-toface meetings. Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages?
Virtual meetings in companies are seen as more ubiquitous recently than offline meetings. This brings more merits as reducing transportation costs and increasing time efficiency, overtaking the drawbacks.
Having online meetings lowers the budget spent on commuting, boosting employees’ purchasing power. Although transport costs could be cut by more than half, most employees experience an increase in their internet bills due to the requirement of having high bandwidth internet speed for video conference. However, many companies have allocated subsidies for this matter. For instance, more than two third of Jakarta’s startup employees claim to have more money to invest in stocks after their companies implemented the Work From Home regulation in 2020 as they did not pay any rent near their workplace and could only work from their parents’ house.
In addition, time efficiency can be encouraged by doing online sync-up, improving employees’ productivity when doing their work. Even though the productivity index skyrocketed among employees, they tend to suffer from screen fatigue due to staring at a screen for a long period of time. Nonetheless, limiting screen time is one of the viable solutions to tackle this issue. For example, research suggests that more than half of agriculture sector employees’ productivity index skyrocketed three-fold after choosing to do meetings virtually compared to the previous Work at The Office regulations.
In conclusion, low transportation budget and high time efficiency are the two plus points of doing corporate meetings virtually than in person. If possible, this needs to be implemented widely in many other big corporations.
- In many workplaces online communication is now more common than face toface meetings Do the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 61
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or Disagree 61
- Some people think that museums should be enjoyable places to entertain people while others believe that the purpose of museums is to educate Discuss both views and give you own opinion 78
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 89
- An increasing number of professionals such as doctors and teachers are leaving their poorer countries to work in developed countries What problem does this cause What solutions can you suggest to deal with this situation 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 272, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...e due to staring at a screen for a long period of time. Nonetheless, limiting screen time is o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, third, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1448.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.67843137255 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01680542226 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.61568627451 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6402104718 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.666666667 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.25 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191982693158 0.244688304435 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771216996553 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0330468709941 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126889360013 0.151304729494 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0146460301624 0.056905535591 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.66 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.