Some people think school should groups pupils according to their academic ability, but others believe pupils with different abilities should be educated together.
Discuss both views and give your opinion
Many people believe that schools should classify students based on their academic achievement. Whilst that is acceptable, I believe that grouping students with various competencies are the better option.
On one side, classifying students based on their academic achievement gives them the opportunity to learn faster. As they learn at the same starting point, they do not have to wait for the other students who are still unable to understand certain topics to reach the same level as them. For instance, the acceleration class in Claveland Highschool recorded that most of the 10th graders of 2020 had been able to understand 12th graders' courses. This is because the acceleration students are being treated as they can absorb knowledge faster. However, this will create skill homogeneity in the learning process as they only perform great on an academic basis.
Nonetheless, grouping students with various skills are needed to better collaborate in the learning process. As they are put into diverse environments, they start to recognize people's strengths and weaknesses. They will realize those diversities can complement each other while reaching the same goal. A study done by the Harvard School of Education in 2004 found that there were 30% higher final exam results in the school in Manhattan that classify their pupils in class based on various skills than those that did not. I believe this school of thought is preferable to make a better learning process in class.
In conclusion, grouping students merely based on academic background enables them to learn faster. However, having students with multifaceted skills in class helps to create collaboration in the learning process. Both of the methods need to be taken into consideration.
- Both Views 11
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kingdom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 73
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 73
- Time Spent Per Activity of People in Several Countries From 1998 to 2009 85
- In many countries plastic containers have become more common than ever and are used by many food and drink companies Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nonetheless, so, still, while, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 24.0651302605 112% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1482.0 1615.20841683 92% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3309352518 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75897170131 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553956834532 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.2375034053 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.8 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.159226946555 0.244688304435 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606094840814 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0554326996256 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.118196440348 0.151304729494 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0630133796542 0.056905535591 111% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.