The graph below shows how people buy music. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph elucidates the percentage of music sales through streams, downloads, and CDs purchased from 2011 to 2018.
In general, while the proportion of those purchasing music through CDs and downloads underwent a downturn, those who streamed music showed the reverse. Streams made up the lion’s share of the sales at the end of the year.
From 2011 to 2014, a marked increase in music sales is seen on streaming platforms and downloads by 15% and 41%, respectively. In comparison, those purchasing music through CD continued to dip considerably by almost half. Also, a considerable gap was shown by approximately two-fifths.
Over the next four years, music download sales plunged after reaching their peak at 42%. The same goes with the CD purchasing sales that gradually decreased by one in ten, making it the least method opted by customers to buy music. Meanwhile, music streaming skyrocketed and became the most favorable place to purchase music, surpassing all other categories.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-21 | Trần Ánh Vy | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-20 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-11 | hahoaan | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- The picture below shows the recycling process of wasted glass bottles 73
- The sum of tourists and the total budget spent among 5 different countries between 2012 and 2013 are displayed in the table 73
- In spite of advances made in agriculture many people around the world still hungry Why is this case What can be done about this problem 67
- The flowchart below shows the recycling process of aluminium cans 61
- Growing number of overweight people is putting a strain on healthcare system in an effort to deal with health issue involved Some people think that the best way to deal with this problem is to introduce more physical education lesson in the shool curricul 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 844.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 160.0 196.424390244 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.275 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.55655882008 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87703732162 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.65625 0.547539520022 120% => OK
syllable_count: 238.5 283.868780488 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.3976567471 43.030603864 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.7777777778 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7777777778 22.9334400587 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.124858249249 0.215688989381 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522767968252 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0346350469453 0.0843802449381 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0778451685309 0.15604864568 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168682023981 0.0819641961636 21% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 61.2550243902 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.4140731707 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.