Group study in schools is more efficient for students than studying by themselves online at home. I completely agree with this view, and I will give my reasons below.
To begin with, online learning has some limitations. For example, school children can ask questions to the instructor immediately about what they fail to understand or what they want to learn more. This hardly happens in online learning settings. Also, it is hard to create a debate culture in internet conditions. Debating is one of the most beneficial ways to instruct children because they can understand the subject further and more deeply by sharing their thoughts with their classmates.
Furthermore, they can focus on the lesson when students gather to study in school, a classroom itself creates an academic atmosphere. What this means is that youngsters feel peer pressure each other, so they can do their best to perform as well as others do. This leads to a higher concentration on the subject. In contrasts, there are so many distractions when studying at the home, such as a cosy bed to lie on and entertainment facilities like the TV. That is to say, students can absorb a larger amount of necessary knowledge more effectively at school.
In conclusion, it is my firm belief that there are more merits of studying in a classroom with classmates because students can ask questions, discuss issues in a more appropriate environment for education. Therefore, learning happened in classrooms is more helpful for learners than e-learning.
- The diagram shows the process of either recycling plastic items to produce goods or trash into dust bins to fill land 73
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 73
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at Queen Mary Hospital since its construction in 1960 73
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 106, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... studying in a classroom with classmates because students can ask questions, disc...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, to begin with, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1275.0 1615.20841683 79% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89849892186 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.608 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.3570889894 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.0714285714 106.682146367 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8571428571 20.7667163134 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.35714285714 7.06120827912 133% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.378153598551 0.244688304435 155% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121093871907 0.084324248473 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0918971658593 0.0667982634062 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.235507025296 0.151304729494 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0737379775503 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.0946893788 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 50.2224549098 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.3001002004 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.0 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.