The four pie charts give the information of the purpose in using smartphones of students in African country through the survey which took place in 2016 to 2019.
It is clearly that almost teenagers spending time on social networks when they were with their phones, which accounted for nearly 50% of the proportion. Email, digital camera and phone calls are the rest three purposes that teenagers use their phones and it also played an important role in the pie chart.
In 2016, social networks was accounted for 50% but it had a slightly drop to 48% in the year after. However, in the next two years, which means 2019, the percentage of the same background increased 8% from 48% to 56%, more than a half of the chart. The second reason that people in the age between 13 and 19 used their phones at that moment was foremail, which stood at 25% in 2016 and drop 6% in the last year of survey ( 19% ). Digital cameras and phone calls were used but less than social medias and email. In 2016, digital cameras accounted for 15%, compared to 10% in phone calls and it is clear to see that in four years, digital cameras always had higher percentage than phone calling. Through 2017, 2018 and 2019, although digital cameras increased more and more by day, phone calls decreased from 13% to only 5% and it was also the smallest proportion of the chart.
- The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 73
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 89
- Prison is the common way in most countries to solve the problem of crime However a more effective solution is to provide people with a better education Agree or disagree 89
- The Table below shows the results of a survey that asked 6800 Scottish adults aged 16 years and over whether they had taken part in different cultural activities in the past 12 months 78
- The diagram below shows the production and processing of milk and dairy products for commercial sale Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 9, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tant role in the pie chart. In 2016, social networks was accounted for 50% bu...
^^
Line 5, column 60, Rule ID: A_RB_NN[1]
Message: You used an adverb ('slightly') instead an adjective, or a noun ('drop') instead of another adjective.
...tworks was accounted for 50% but it had a slightly drop to 48% in the year after. However, in t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 422, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...6 and drop 6% in the last year of survey 19% . Digital cameras and phone calls we...
^^
Line 5, column 427, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... drop 6% in the last year of survey 19% . Digital cameras and phone calls were us...
^^
Line 5, column 876, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o the smallest proportion of the chart.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, second, so, as for
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 3.15609756098 317% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 14.0 5.60731707317 250% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 37.0 33.7804878049 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 242.0 196.424390244 123% => OK
Chars per words: 4.5826446281 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.21545226967 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.528925619835 0.547539520022 97% => OK
syllable_count: 305.1 283.868780488 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7455987071 43.030603864 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.222222222 112.824112599 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8888888889 22.9334400587 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.22222222222 5.23603664747 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 1.69756097561 295% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.292222713689 0.215688989381 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121273527517 0.103423049105 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.062634181519 0.0843802449381 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.212947584206 0.15604864568 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218893479927 0.0819641961636 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 70.47 61.2550243902 115% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.58 11.4140731707 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.41 8.06136585366 92% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 40.7170731707 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.