The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry. The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are set up.
The table illustrates the predicted amount on money spent for environmental projects concerning forestry in West Africa, Central America and South-East Africa, the following five years, while the different reasons for the forecast cost in the first year.
In the first year, West Africa is projected to spend 10,5 million dollars, while the amount that will be spent by Central America and South-East Asia is double and triple respectively.
During the second year the amount is forecast to drop moderately for the three countries. By the third and fourth year, West Africa’s expenditure is es...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-24 | mary.ssherr | 73 | view |
| 2015-10-05 | AlexandraTz | view | |
| 2014-05-14 | tural123321 | 80 | view |
- The car is possibly the most convenient and popular way of getting from A to B However due to its impact on the environment and the risk it poses to pedestrians and motorists governments should take urgent steps to reduce our dependency on this mode of tr 87
- The number of elderly people in the world is increasing. What do you think are the positive and negative effects of this trend? 80
- Some people believe that competitive sports, both team and individual, have no place in the school curriculum. How far do you agree or disagree? 80
- The table below shows the projected costings over the next five years in American dollars for three environmental projects for sustainable forestry. The pie chart shows the expected expenditure breakdown allocation for the first year as the projects are s
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free.Do you think that the advantages of charging people for admission to museum outweigh the disadvantages? give reasons & include any relevant examples. 87
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.5 out of 9
Category: Very Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 9 10
No. of Words: 250 200
No. of Characters: 1207 1000
No. of Different Words: 118 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.976 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.828 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.63 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 84 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 65 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 44 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 26 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 27.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.324 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.778 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.45 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.757 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.153 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 4