Table
The table illustrates the proportion of four different modes of specialised jobs for both genders in three distinctive years from 1990 to 2010. The enterprises are retail, health, manufacturing and tourism.
Overall, compared to males, the percentage of female workers levels are increased except manufacturing sector over the given year and the specialist male's levels are decreasing slightly.
With regards to the retail sector for males the proportion remained the same in all three years while females show mild improvements from seven to nine percent. Over to the health speciality, both genders has improvement although, females has the considerable growth from nine to fifteen percentage while males was mere seven to nine percent.
In terms of manufacturing and tourism, males levels was declining steadily with 30% to 10% and 13% to 10% respectively. Whereas, females ratio in tourism sector was increased to 27% by 2010 from 23%. Moreover, females level in manufacturing sector was dropped to 3% in 2010 which was 7% in 1990.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | view | |
| 2024-11-16 | Trần Ánh Vy | 67 | view |
| 2024-11-12 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-26 | Giang Tran | 84 | view |
- The diagram below shows how the solar powered water pump work Summarise the information and selecting the features
- The exploration and development of safe alternatives to fossil fuels should be the most important global priority today To what extent do you agree or disagree 71
- The maps below show Pebbleton 20 years ago and today Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Solar energy is becoming more and more popular as a source of household energy in many countries around the world Why is this What are the advantages and disadvantages of solar energy 73
- Many people believe that schools should teach children to become good citizens and workers rather than independent individuals. To what extent do you agree or disagree? Give your own opinion and relevant examples. 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 121, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...30% to 10% and 13% to 10% respectively. Whereas, females ratio in tourism sector was in...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 5.60731707317 0% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38414634146 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93045380247 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 91.0 106.607317073 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.55487804878 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 257.4 283.868780488 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8019334619 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.5 5.23603664747 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0427885392304 0.215688989381 20% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0218910107741 0.103423049105 21% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579181704561 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0383563838563 0.15604864568 25% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0664352056337 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.77 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 43.0 40.7170731707 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.