Discussion and delibaration is key to taking progressive decisions. Progress be it in any aspect of world affairs such as science, literature, religion or philosophy has relied on discussion and debate for centuries. The prompt suggests the same that progress in any situation is guided by debate between opposing views. The thought is undoubtedly justified as contarst has always bought nuanced clarity. It is only when different sides of an issue start heavily touting their opinions and refuting others that we are able to reach a conclusion that can be relied upon. Upon careful deliberation by different views on a common topic several unique views are brought to the topic, this ensures no aspect is left untouched about an issue before a solution is reached. Though it is claimed to be time consuming, it is also true that decisions taken in haste are not fruitful.
Debate has been the foundation of progress for any field. The very nature of debate ensures this by strongly incentivizing each side to tout its opinion and refute other's opinion on grounds of logic . It is only through debate that different conflicting nuances of an issue are brought forth by each side. In the times of famous astrinomers such as Galelio and Cornspicious the debate that ensued about the revolution of earth: whether earth revolves around the sun or the sun revolves around the earth. This contraversial view that earth revolved around the sun was advocated by Galieleo and Cornspicious which was not quite popular among the established thought that world revolved around the earth. The debate that followed complemented with ovbservation and experiments conducted by the two scienctists established that earth revolved around the sun, progressing the sciences of that time.
Discussions and debates are taken up by different parties and ususally different opinions are brought forth by opposite sides. This multifaceted discussion ensures that no stone is ever left unturned. Since, all aspects of an issue are thorughouly discussed no point of contention is left after a conclusion is reached. This makes the decision reached from debate of opposing sides reliable. Marinda, the not for profit research institute, recently conducted a survey about how important breakthroughs in since were achieved in the past 300 years. The results of the survey concluded that all major breakthroughs of the past had relied upon most careful of delibarations for 95% of all important breakthroughs and decisions taken into consideration.
It is well-known that delibarations and discussions are quite lengthy. Many times a swift decisions are favored and delibarations are viewed as unnecessary. However, it must not be forgotten that quick discussions often lead to unfavorbale results. Most autocratic states are a testonomy to this thought. Most autocracats involve themselves in unnecesary micromangement, and take imprudent decisions on whim. These decisions pile up with time and lead to collapse of their empires. Recently, an autocratic country of the east collapsed on its own debt that it owed itslef. The country had in order to capitalize on real estate boom, incentivized loans to real estate firms. These firms took several times more loan and did not deliver projects on time. What followed was firms declaring themselves bankrupt followed by banks and then the nation was finally consumed by chaos. What we need to understand is that time spent on discussions and debate is not wasted rather well consumed.
In conclusion, we can say that debate and discussion are key for progressive developments.
- Woven baskets characterized by a particular distinctive pattern have previously been found only in the immediate vicinity of the prehistoric village of Palea and therefore were believed to have been made only by the Palean people Recently however archaeol 70
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 66
- 23 Governments should place few if any restrictions on scientific research and development 83
- The best leaders are those who encourage feedback from the people whom they lead 66
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 277, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... the same that progress in any situation is guided by debate between opposing vie...
^^
Line 5, column 199, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...efute others opinion on grounds of logic . It is only through debate that differen...
^^
Line 7, column 468, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h institute, recently conducted a survey about how important breakthroughs in sin...
^^
Line 9, column 911, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...haos. What we need to understand is that time spent on discussions and debate is ...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is not wasted rather well consumed. In conclusion, we can say that debate an...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, however, if, so, then, well, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 37.0 19.5258426966 189% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 12.4196629213 32% => OK
Conjunction : 20.0 14.8657303371 135% => OK
Relative clauses : 20.0 11.3162921348 177% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 33.0505617978 130% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 82.0 58.6224719101 140% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 3037.0 2235.4752809 136% => OK
No of words: 574.0 442.535393258 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29094076655 5.05705443957 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.89472135074 4.55969084622 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94793433173 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 280.0 215.323595506 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.487804878049 0.4932671777 99% => OK
syllable_count: 942.3 704.065955056 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 20.2370786517 153% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.6495196456 60.3974514979 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.9677419355 118.986275619 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5161290323 23.4991977007 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.12903225806 5.21951772744 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 7.80617977528 64% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 10.2758426966 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.13820224719 175% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.121411997676 0.243740707755 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0363681137118 0.0831039109588 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0403468785376 0.0758088955206 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0785758017255 0.150359130593 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0252575871786 0.0667264976115 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 14.1392134831 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.1639044944 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.38706741573 102% => OK
difficult_words: 145.0 100.480337079 144% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.