Some people prefer to live in a house while others think that there are more advantages living in an apartment.
Do the drawbacks of living in a house outweigh the benefits?
People hold conflicting views about whether they should settle down in a house or an apartment in a residential building. While there are numerous disadvantages of living in a house, I am of the opinion that the advantages are greater.
On the one hand, this type of accommodation can be disadvantageous for various reasons. Firstly, the security system of houses is, in the aggregate, inferior to that of high-rise buildings. The major reason is that most houses are without professional security staff, anti-theft keycards and cameras. This lures potential burglars into committing theft in these areas, especially when house owners are away. Secondly, real estate tends to be prohibitively expensive, particularly in metropolises. A large number of dwellers in Hanoi, for instance, cannot afford a house although they spend years working hard and saving money. In this case, an apartment seems to be a more affordable choice for the majority of the population.
On the other hand, I would argue that the disadvantages of possessing a house pale in comparison with the benefits. One of the key advantages is that it is easier for one to escape or to be rescued from a house if there is an emergency such as an earthquake or a fire happening. Unlike high-rise blocks, houses are considerably lower with fewer floors and exits can be quickly navigated, which is one of the most decisive factors to survive in life-threatening situations. Additionally, house owners are more likely to ensure better living space for family members, especially for children. These children tend to be healthier and more sociable when playing sports with friends in their backyard or garden on a daily basis while those living in an apartment often do nothing but spend hours watching TV or playing video games in their free time due to the lack of playgrounds in many residential buildings these days.
In conclusion, despite several drawbacks that residing in a house has, I subscribe to the idea that they are far outweighed by the substantial benefits.
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others think that there are more advantages living in an apartment Do the drawbacks of living in a house outweigh the benefits
- Walking is known to be beneficial to health and yet fewer and fewer people are walking these days What are the reasons for this What can be done to tackle this problem 89
- Some people prefer to live in a house while others think that there are more advantages living in an apartment Do the drawbacks of living in a house outweigh the benefits 84
- Some people regard video games as harmless fun or even as a useful educational tool Others however believe that video games are having an adverse effect on the people who play them In your opinion do the drawbacks of video games outweigh the benefits 89
- Some people say the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities Others however say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required Discuss both views and give your opinion 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 497, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: Many; Numerous
...xpensive, particularly in metropolises. A large number of dwellers in Hanoi, for instance, cannot...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, well, while, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1705.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08955223881 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0125511562 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576119402985 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.1558824769 49.4020404114 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.666666667 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30439191415 0.244688304435 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0896758869496 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0564781443993 0.0667982634062 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182408127235 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0706226926092 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.