Some people think that famous people can help international aid organizations to draw attention to important problems. Others believe that the celebrities can make the problems seem less important. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is undeniable that celebrities play a significant role into different subject in today's world and there are opposite attitudes in terms of their effect on the important problems. Some people believe they are useful toward solving problems and others think reversely. This debate has been evaluated in this essay and my idea has been presented to sum up.
As a fact, well-known persons have ability to attract attention and resources in corporation with NGOs and other international organization to solve the prominent issues. Also, they can establish their charity organization to help people. For example, Bill Gates, the Microsoft CEO, sets up his foundation in this purpose.
In the other way, their manner and life style has huge effect on the other's behavior. In the other words, they are an exemplified society. For instance Leonardo Dcaprio had a speech about the environmental problems and it led to a lot of debate in following.
On the other hand, the main goal of some celebrities is earning more money and they will carry out in accordance with companies' benefits in spite of their social responsibilities. In this case, the actors which smoke cigarettes in their role that provoke teenagers to use it by ignoring the serious consequence, are the best example.
As a last point, the popular persons may not have any reaction in face of other people difficulties and prefer to be silent and stay in the safe side. This behavior will be resulted to continuing and growing the problems spontaneously.
In conclusion, it seems the positive role of famous people is stronger than the drawbacks. Indeed, some of the celebrities move just toward personal interests and generally they are beside the ordinary people.
- nowadays more and more older people who need employment compete with the younger people for the same job what problems this causes what are the solutions 78
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 78
- in spite of the many advances women have made in education and employment they continue to be at a disadvantage when it comes to pay and promotion in your view what should be done to promote equality of opportunity for men and women in the workplace 56
- Leaders and directors in an organization are normally older people Some people think younger leader would be better Do you agree or disagree 78
- Nowadays many of families have both parents working Some working parents believe other family members like grandparents can take care of their children while others think childcare centers provide the best care Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 70, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'others'' or 'other's'?
Suggestion: others'; other's
...r and life style has huge effect on the others behavior. In the other words, they are ...
^^^^^^
Line 6, column 99, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...is stronger than the drawbacks. Indeed, some of the celebrities move just toward personal i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in spite of, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1445.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08802816901 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85827668118 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.598591549296 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2711359992 49.4020404114 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.3333333333 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.9333333333 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.2 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22257716236 0.244688304435 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682782031907 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625805373154 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101033658019 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0386209476853 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.