School should teach students sex education comprehensively. do you agree or disagree?
Teaching sex education comprehensively to children has been topical nowadays. Some observers suggest that it should not be a lesson to teach in elementary to high school because it may expose students to adult content. However, I side with other scientist that saying school should teach sex education to children since early age for preventing sexual harassment.
Indeed, one of the best ways to reduce the case of sexual harassment happened to children is by teaching them comprehensively about what sex is. Lessons like which body parts that other people cannot touch, and how to value their body are highly necessary. By understanding these issues, students might be able to stay in distance from any strangers who may try to sensually expose their body. The more sex materials given to student; the more children are aware of any threats to sexual harassment.
Apart from it, a different view comes from sociologists claiming that sex education might not be suitable to children in as much as the lesson provided does not matched with their early age. These people add in terms of adult content, that the level of understanding between young-adult individuals and children is different. Therefore, elementary students, for instance, may not be able to understand fully about what sex education is.
If different understanding level is the case why few experts prohibit sex education to children, then the problem is on the way how teachers deliver the lesson. Naturally, humans were born with the same cognitive ability regardless of age, race, and culture. Hence, if teachers can manage to present sex materials by using games or analogy that adjust to children point of view, students will effectively understand sex education.
In conclusion, although sociology experts may argue that sex education is inappropriate to teach to children, I do believe that by using a proper method, sex education can prevent student to be a victim of sexual harassment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-26 | Trần Ánh Vy | 78 | view |
| 2024-10-21 | aceg1000 | 73 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | vidung | 90 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
| 2024-10-19 | Tuan Harry | 11 | view |
- In many countries schools have severe problems with student behavior What do you think are the causes of this What solutions can you suggest 84
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 61
- Some schools have restricted the use of mobile phones Is this a possitive development or a negative one 61
- Every year several languages die out Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 56
- Organized tour to remote community and other countries is increasingly popular Is it a positive or negative development for the local people and environment 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 162, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[3]
Message: The verb 'does' requires base form of the verb: 'match'
Suggestion: match
...as much as the lesson provided does not matched with their early age. These people add ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, however, if, may, so, then, therefore, apart from, for instance, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1657.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2106918239 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86348167674 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544025157233 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.5731259801 49.4020404114 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.357142857 106.682146367 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7142857143 20.7667163134 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.07142857143 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282258138172 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107375822036 0.084324248473 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0879500926514 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.182328780669 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104070907748 0.056905535591 183% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.5 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.