Currently, numerous education systems have operated specialized learning programs for students at the age of 15. However, some people argue that students need to study a variety of subjects until leaving school. From my viewpoint, albeit offering certain benefits, an extensive curriculum is still inferior to a specialized one for high-school students
On the one hand, studying a wide range of subjects can be advantageous for older schoolchildren in some aspects. First and foremost, students can acquire extensive knowledge for comprehensive personal development. As they learn multiple subjects at school from mathematics, and physics to literature, and geography, their background knowledge will be broadened considerably. This will give them a multi-dimensional outlook on life and solve problems in numerous fields. For instance, in Vietnam, students aiming at engineering courses in university are only required to have good grades in Maths and Physics. However, the knowledge they have acquired in non-major classes like English or Computer Science can offer them a competitive edge when they apply for a job in a multinational company, compared to those unfamiliar with foreign languages or computers.
On the other hand, I concur that concentrating on a smaller range of subjects can bring more benefits to students from the age of 15. To begin with, studying only a subset of subjects at school provides students with greater motivation. Should students be allowed to choose the subjects they yearn for, they will put more dedication to studying, thus heightening their overall learning productivity in lieu of having to focus on other subjects they are not interested in. Furthermore, specializing in certain subjects since the age of 15 assists pupils to have a higher likelihood of success in their future jobs. In addition, students who study only a few subjects have more time for other purposes than those studying so many. With fewer subjects to learn, they have extra time either for stress relievers such as playing some sport or taking a rest or for further research related to their chosen subjects. Scientifically, these activities increase their study efficiency and academic performance, so such an education system is much better than that forcing students to learn various subjects.
In conclusion, although studying wide-ranging subjects can be favourable to students to some extent, students will derive more benefits from a specialized curriculum from the age of 15 regarding deeper study and relaxation. Nevertheless, this educational approach should be implemented in accordance with a tactful orientation program for students below this age so that the policy can bring the optimal outcome for all.
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn
- nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants why do you think people waste food what can be done to reduce the amount of food that throw away 78
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The charts below show the percentage of people working in different sectors in Town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010 67
- The diagram below shows how ethanol fuel is produced from corn Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, still, thus, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 64.0 41.998997996 152% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2314.0 1615.20841683 143% => OK
No of words: 423.0 315.596192385 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47044917258 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.53508145475 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05928069017 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 225.0 176.041082164 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.531914893617 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 711.0 506.74238477 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1150894536 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.117647059 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8823529412 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.64705882353 7.06120827912 137% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.399592533954 0.244688304435 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.143255582173 0.084324248473 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0826895322245 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265456558548 0.151304729494 175% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.077219052446 0.056905535591 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.0946893788 128% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 123.0 78.4519038076 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.