Remote working has become more and more common in many countries.
What are the advantages and disadvantages of remote working?
In recent years, working remotely has become increasingly popular in many parts of the world. This essay will shed some light on both the benefits and drawbacks of this trend.
On the one hand, it is undeniable that remote working brings about a number of merits. To begin with, a remote working policy can give a company’s employees more time to spend on their work. When working remotely, employees do not have to commute to their physical workplaces. Therefore, these employees can take the time they would otherwise use for commuting and turn it into productive working hours. Another obvious advantage of working remotely is that it reduces business overheads. Fewer people in the workplace means less office space is needed, which would cut back on the costs of leasing office space, and other associated expenses, such as electricity bills. Consequently, many firms can save a great amount of money.
On the other hand, there are also several downsides to telecommuting. Firstly, working remotely can cause some workers to feel isolated, and as a result, may negatively affect their productivity. Meanwhile, working together in an office provides employees with the opportunity to bond over shared experiences and build camaraderie with each other. Furthermore, telecommuters undoubtedly face more distractions, such as housework or their family members, compared to when working in an office. As a result, an employee might consistently show a lack of focus or dedication to the company.
In conclusion, there is no doubt that remote working offers both advantages and disadvantages for many firms and their employees around the world.
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 73
- Some people claim that what people eat in many Western countries is unhealthy and their diet is getting worse Critics say that these countries should change their diet What are your opinions on this 84
- The bar graph below shows the amount of carbon emissions in different countries during three different years Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- In some countries a few people earn extremely high salaries Some people think that this is good for a country while others believe government should control salaries and limit the amount people can earn Discuss both views and give your opinion 78
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding change Others however think that change is always a good thing 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31679389313 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89495450925 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614503816794 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.956573574 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356879178573 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120971002501 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109817431209 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220131434694 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555877860459 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, may, so, therefore, while, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as a result, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 13.1623246493 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 8.3376753507 12% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1393.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.31679389313 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89495450925 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614503816794 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.956573574 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.8666666667 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.4666666667 20.7667163134 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3333333333 7.06120827912 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.356879178573 0.244688304435 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120971002501 0.084324248473 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.109817431209 0.0667982634062 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.220131434694 0.151304729494 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555877860459 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 50.2224549098 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.28 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 78.4519038076 83% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.