There are three possible explanations for the transient lunar phenomenon, according to the reading passage, but the speaker disagrees with that perspective.
It is claimed in the reading that the TLP is a mistaken observation that the objects are always within the scope of the telescope. Therefore, the TLP is not associated with the Moon itself. The speaker, however, states that the TLP does not appear randomly, but is found in two specific locations. As a result, the opinion expressed in the reading is in question.
Additionally, the reading suggests that the TLP is caused by numerous collisions between meteors traveling at high speeds. According to the speaker, the light from the meteor often shines for a short period of time. It is of note, however, that the TLP persists for almost twenty minutes, which is also in contrast to the reading.
Lastly, the reading mentions that the TLP may be the light reflected from the sun by the rock which can be found in the earth, however the speaker in the listening material maintains that determining the TLP is very difficult because the moon reflects light from the sun more than does the rock. As a result, the reading passage has once again been contradicted. As a result, the speaker makes a total departure from the opinions expressed in the reading.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement For any business to be successful it must spend a lot of money on advertising 93
- Transient lunar phenomena TLP are relatively brief flashes of light that appear to come from the surface of the Moon Such flashes of light have been observed for centuries by both amateur and professional astronomers and several theories have been put for 66
- Transient lunar phenomena TLP are relatively brief flashes of light that appear to come from the surface of the Moon Such flashes of light have been observed for centuries by both amateur and professional astronomers and several theories have been put for 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 201, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...rom the meteor often shines for a short period of time. It is of note, however, that the TLP p...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, lastly, may, so, therefore, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 7.30242825607 27% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 12.0772626932 83% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 22.412803532 49% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1098.0 1373.03311258 80% => OK
No of words: 222.0 270.72406181 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.94594594595 5.08290768461 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.8600083453 4.04702891845 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69250327729 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 114.0 145.348785872 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.513513513514 0.540411800872 95% => OK
syllable_count: 320.4 419.366225166 76% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 62.9104046106 49.2860985944 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.8181818182 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1818181818 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.36363636364 7.06452816374 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 0.0 4.33554083885 0% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.180314125529 0.272083759551 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640793893153 0.0996497079465 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.038230537723 0.0662205650399 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106616060128 0.162205337803 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.018875286436 0.0443174109184 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.3589403974 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 53.8541721854 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.2367328918 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 63.6247240618 90% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.