Fossil fuel is the main source of energy. In some countries, the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged. To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development?
Fossil fuels have been considered as a major power source by many nations till date. However, some countries have shifted towards natural sources, such as wind and sun. In my view, it is a positive development and will discuss why alternate sources are a boon.
To begin with, the fossil fuels are non-renewable sources of energy because they cannot be reused if used once. Moreover, they are being over exploited these days, which will lead to their complete exhaustion in coming time. This arises the need of alternative power which could completely replace them in future. In addition to, the burning of fuels produces exhausting fumes which enter into the atmosphere and deteriorate the air quality. To illustrate, according to an official report of the US energy administration, 76% of greenhouse gas emissions are solely due to burning of fossil fuels to produce electricity.
Despite the higher costs of installation of alternate resources of power, they are cost saving and efficient over the longer duration of time. The major advantage of using them is that they are eco-friendly. In other words, they produce clean and green energy with no wastage. Furthermore, they are the renewable resources which can be utilised again and again and can be replenished. Another important point to be considered is that sources of non-conventional potential, such as solar, tidal and hydroelectric are natural, therefore, they are available in all geographical locations.
In conclusion, it can be rightly said that the fossil fuels should be replaced by alternative ways as they are non-renewable and pollutes the environment. In my opinion, it is worthwhile to use renewable resources because they are both sustainable and environmental friendly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-09-07 | tieuquynh | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | baokhuyen759 | 67 | view |
| 2022-08-15 | baokhuyen759 | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-29 | Niusha | 84 | view |
| 2020-03-10 | iceber9 | 84 | view |
- Topic People living in the 21st century have a better quality of life than the previous centuries To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism of their teachers Others think it will lead to a loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views and g 89
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think it is a positive or negative development 73
- The charts give information about two genres of TV programmes watched by men and women and four different age groups in Australia 78
- Topic The use of social media e g Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact for many people in everyday life 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...wer which could completely replace them in future. In addition to, the burning of fuels p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29136690647 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04921630871 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579136690647 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0143832428 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207328015386 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727390767897 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662472562546 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133704454445 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665368059053 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 303, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...wer which could completely replace them in future. In addition to, the burning of fuels p...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, while, in addition, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in my view, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1471.0 1615.20841683 91% => OK
No of words: 278.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.29136690647 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04921630871 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579136690647 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0143832428 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.0666666667 106.682146367 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.5333333333 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0666666667 7.06120827912 143% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207328015386 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727390767897 0.084324248473 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0662472562546 0.0667982634062 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133704454445 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665368059053 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.4 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.