The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
Both teachers and students are responsible for the situations that happen in the common classroom. While the teacher still holds an exemplar role in Education, it is important to highlight that self-efficacy cannot be overlooked. The students need to be aware of how their behaviour can impact their learning outcomes. Praise plays an important part in keeping students motivated to continue tackling the subjects taught in the classroom as well, additionally, it can also keep the emotionally engaged with the classroom settings.
Various studies in the Educational field support that praise is by far the most efficient way to establish an instructor-pupil relationship that will be able to make a meaningful impact on how learner navigate through their studies. Although a certain degree of hierarchy must be maintained, it is fascinating to observe that a teacher can be both a respectable but accessible figure.
The know-it-all strict teacher does not align with the advances that have been made in the field of Education, but one can hardly ignore the fact that negative actions are certain to take place in every school at some point in time. Therefore, learners need to be oriented about what is expected from them and what are the consequences of intolerable acts. Nonetheless, it is necessary to say that if teachers can educate for life and not only for the exams, the learners will be able to envision how their attitude today can yield fruits that might last a lifetime.
The solution is to seek balance in teaching methodologies and understand that real Education goes beyond those four walls.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-22 | Celestina Asantewaa | 50 | view |
| 2024-08-26 | aaa111 | 33 | view |
| 2024-07-13 | sepnkycehmqcodjefl | 50 | view |
| 2024-04-17 | guozhishan | 50 | view |
| 2023-12-28 | mei_unavailable | 83 | view |
- Claim Even though young people often receive the advice to follow your dreams more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals Reason Many people s dreams are inherently selfish Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 50
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts Write a response in which you d 58
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 16
- The best way to teach is to praise positive actions and ignore negative ones Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and supporti 16
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, nonetheless, so, still, therefore, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 12.4196629213 105% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 14.8657303371 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 33.0505617978 64% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 58.6224719101 56% => More preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 5.0 12.9106741573 39% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1355.0 2235.4752809 61% => OK
No of words: 263.0 442.535393258 59% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15209125475 5.05705443957 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 4.55969084622 88% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93077223593 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 215.323595506 73% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.600760456274 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 704.065955056 59% => syllable counts are too short.
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 6.24550561798 64% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 4.38483146067 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 20.2370786517 49% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 23.0359550562 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.0946324971 60.3974514979 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.5 118.986275619 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.3 23.4991977007 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.7 5.21951772744 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0696702987812 0.243740707755 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0271849126405 0.0831039109588 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0298687438488 0.0758088955206 39% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0392707441144 0.150359130593 26% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0212259798064 0.0667264976115 32% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 14.1392134831 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 12.1743820225 110% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.1639044944 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.38706741573 110% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 100.480337079 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 11.2143820225 111% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.7820224719 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.