Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development?
It is true that advertisements have played a significant role in our daily life. I personally believe that this trend has both benefits and drawbacks.
There are several benefits which can be reaped from the continuing popularity of advertisements. Regarding the first advantage, a lot of big cooperations can reach their prospects. Advertisements bring about more opportunities for a product to be easily bought because they not only attract human’s attention but also motivate their potential customers to purchase a lot of times. Another benefit is that homo sapiens may find the best solution solving their problems in an easier way. This is because more and more companies are formulating the services or tools that can bring measures for adverse effects in a daily life, so advertisements can make our daily life more convenient in that respect.
Despite the aforementioned benefits, advertisements can have several drawbacks. Perhaps one of these is that the majority of companies are just focusing on sales. This will lead to a lot of advertisements or sale copies containing fancy words but the community may not achieve the real benefits or features mentioned in flyers and media ads. The second issue is that advertisements can mislead the people’s knowledge. The majority of customers are not willing to find information about the product which they are going to buy, so they may purchase for a simple thing with a lot of money without a doubt.
In conclusion, various advantages can be derived from the prevalence of advertisements. However, this phenomenon can produce some negative impacts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-29 | vidung | 89 | view |
| 2024-08-24 | Tuan Harry | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-18 | MEBC Class | 80 | view |
| 2024-07-12 | MEBC Class | 75 | view |
| 2024-07-11 | trần ngọc tuấn | 67 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Cambridge 7 test 2 task 1 78
- More and more people are migrating to cities in search of a better life but city life can be extremely difficult Explain some of the difficulties of living in a city How can governments make urban life better for everyone 56
- The line graphs of five different communication services worldwide 61
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that it is more effective for students to study in a group while others believe that it is better for them to study alone 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25968992248 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12870416246 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4025334331 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9285714286 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16331559701 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488145966184 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722898796574 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869973654682 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583883680272 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, may, regarding, second, so, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1357.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25968992248 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12870416246 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.573643410853 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 432.0 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4025334331 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.9285714286 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4285714286 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16331559701 0.244688304435 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488145966184 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722898796574 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0869973654682 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0583883680272 0.056905535591 103% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.