In today's chaotic life machines have become an integral part of our lives. We cannot fanthom a single day without the use of simplest of machines like calculator. There is undeniably a dependence of human nature on machine which is slowly becoming irreversible. That being said, I would still like to believe that the human brain will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.
To support my opinion I would like to present a few examples. History is the proof that several machines have been invented by humans for the betterment of the mankind. Present time is the proof that none of them are superior to human minds. To start off a lot of machines like washing machines or cars have been developed for the comfort of the mankind. They have their own importance but, possibily could never be superior to human minds.
There are inventions of smarter machines such as computers and smart phones which are programmed to perform multiple tasks at the same time in a very efficient manner. There have been recent developments such as adding voice recognisation and reading finger prints which is not possible for the humans to perform. But that necessarily doesn't make them smart. At the end of the day, it was humans who programmed them to perform those specific tasks.
Truth doesn't change that inventions and creativity of human minds cannot be meet by machines no matter how hard we try to accomplish it. If it would be possible to do, then there would be no need for humans to perform any tasks. Even today we cannot rely on a machien to take care of a two year old, we would certainly prefer a human to be present. The reason being simple, humans have the empathy and creative touch which the machines will never be able to posses.
Thus, I would like to conclude by stating the obvious that machines can never over take humans in several categories. Some of them primarily being emotions and creativity. There are certainly other fields where machines are better than humans but like discussed they mostly exist to help us in our manual work.
- In many organizations perhaps the best way to approach certain new projects is to assemble a group of people into a team Having a team of people attack a project offers several advantages First of all a group of people has a wider range of knowledge exper 73
- Students should always question what they are taught instead of accepting it passively Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing an 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Television advertising directed toward young children aged two to five shouldn t be allowed 73
- Toward the end of his life the Chevalier de Seingalt 1725 1798 wrote a long memoir recounting hislife and adventures The Chevalier was a somewhat controversial figure but since he met many famouspeople including kings and writers his memoir has b 80
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reaso 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 336, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...humans to perform. But that necessarily doesnt make them smart. At the end of the day,...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 7, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...o perform those specific tasks. Truth doesnt change that inventions and creativity o...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[9]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put before the verb 'can'.
Suggestion: never can
...de by stating the obvious that machines can never over take humans in several categories....
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, still, then, thus, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 25.0 19.5258426966 128% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 12.4196629213 113% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 12.9106741573 31% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 2235.4752809 77% => OK
No of words: 364.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.73901098901 5.05705443957 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36792674256 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44491757856 2.79657885939 87% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 215.323595506 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521978021978 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 549.0 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.9248766133 60.3974514979 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 86.25 118.986275619 72% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2 23.4991977007 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.95 5.21951772744 37% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.13820224719 97% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.83258426966 62% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.307242188578 0.243740707755 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0990211042111 0.0831039109588 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0732759111693 0.0758088955206 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179805841252 0.150359130593 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611916805148 0.0667264976115 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.0 14.1392134831 71% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 48.8420337079 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 12.1743820225 75% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 12.1639044944 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.31 8.38706741573 87% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 100.480337079 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.8971910112 67% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.