The reading and lecture are both about a painting made by famous Dutch painter Rembrandt. The author of the reading states that there have been several problem with the painting that suggests it was not the work of the artist whereas, the lecturer later provides information that a thorough examination by a panel of researcher proves that painting was indeed made by the artist.
Preeminently, according to the reading there were inconsistency regarding the dressing of the women in the portrait. The author starts by explaining how the white linen cap and luxurious fur creates ambiguity regarding the status. He points out that an artist like Rembrandt, who is known for meticulous work would never be guilty of this. However, the lecturer disputes this point. She claims that the fur was colored over the top of the original painting hundred years later. She points out this might have been done to increase it's value.
By the same token, the reading states that the painting lacked the light and shadow combination. The author argues that the dark fur collar absorbs light rather than reflecting it. Nevertheless, the lecturer refutes this argument. She asserts that after analyzing the original color of fur was light which provided the perfect combination for light and shadow.
In winding up, the reading contends that the painting was made on several pieces of wood glued together. It was known that the artist usually used a single piece of wood. In contrast, the lecturer's stance is that additional piece of wood was glued to the original painting to make it look grand and valuable.
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take In de 54
- Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people 70
- The luxuries and conveniences of contemporary life prevent people from developing into truly strong and independent individuals Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning f 50
- In order for any work of art for example a film a novel a poem or a song to have merit it must be understandable to most people Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reaso 50
- TPO 7 Ecocertification for wood companies 75
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'several problems'.
Suggestion: several problems
...the reading states that there have been several problem with the painting that suggests it was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...d over the top of the original painting hundred years later. She points out this might ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
... single piece of wood. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that additional piece of wood...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, in contrast, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00751879699 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51307845967 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545112781955 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0129350141 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16794837125 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593503718693 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680956151635 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103969172484 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559523950112 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 145, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun problem seems to be countable; consider using: 'several problems'.
Suggestion: several problems
...the reading states that there have been several problem with the painting that suggests it was ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 458, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a hundred'.
Suggestion: a hundred
...d over the top of the original painting hundred years later. She points out this might ...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 189, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
... single piece of wood. In contrast, the lecturers stance is that additional piece of wood...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, nevertheless, regarding, so, whereas, in contrast, by the same token
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 12.0772626932 116% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 22.412803532 112% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 30.3222958057 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1332.0 1373.03311258 97% => OK
No of words: 266.0 270.72406181 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00751879699 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51307845967 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 145.348785872 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545112781955 0.540411800872 101% => OK
syllable_count: 396.9 419.366225166 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 3.25607064018 154% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 56.0129350141 49.2860985944 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.8 110.228320801 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 21.698381199 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.53333333333 7.06452816374 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 4.19205298013 72% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.16794837125 0.272083759551 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593503718693 0.0996497079465 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0680956151635 0.0662205650399 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103969172484 0.162205337803 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0559523950112 0.0443174109184 126% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.3589403974 82% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.48 12.2367328918 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 63.6247240618 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.7273730684 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.