When a new technological device becomes available, some people buy it right away; others wait until many have adopted it. Which view do you agree with?
It is hard to deny that buying a smart device as soon as it is released will enable people to take advantage of the latest technologies, and such a fact leads some impressionable people to believe that purchasing the newly developed device right away is a good choice. However, such a statement suffers from both logical and factual fallacies. As far as various factors are concerned, I strongly hold the point that it is better to buy a new technological device after many people have adopted it.
First of all, it is much more financially feasible to purchase a technological product after many have adopted it. It is very normal for a retailer to set a relatively high price as soon as the product is released since the demand is surging. Meanwhile, after some time, the price will drop as the demand decreases. As a result, if you buy the product after some time it is released, you may get a much lower price. Therefore, the extent of the benefit of buying smart devices after some time is clear even to the layman’s eyes, and it is wise to purchase the device until many have adopted it.
Furthermore, the fact that people are often prone to make bad decisions indicates that people should wait until buying the goods. Take the case of one of my friends, Henry, who is a college student like thousands of others. He often regrets what he bought before, especially on the day when some new smartphones are released. After watching the on-site delivery, he will become excited and seek to buy the devices instantly. As a result, he often complains that the product he buys is not what he wants. Had it not been for his impulsive decision, he would never regret it so many times.
Nevertheless, a voice arises that buying a newly developed product will enable you to preview the latest technological trends. Ironically, new products are usually unstable, as it provides much less time for customers to find problems in them. Although they provide some new features that we’ve never seen before, it is not worth it when it comes to degeneration in experience. Therefore, I would prefer to buy a product after some time it is released rather than purchase it as soon as it is developed.
In a nutshell, I maintain that it is better to purchase a new technological device after many have adopted it. Admittedly, as my favorite saying from James Madison goes, “as long as the reason of man continues fallible, different opinions will be formed”, and many people may oppose my opinion. However, I believe that they will change their mind after being exposed to my article.
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72727272727 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67904283558 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472283813747 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8908477155 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.523809524 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4761904762 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297786745626 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881200691154 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761709995373 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16549939246 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514871360874 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, while, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 24.0 15.1003584229 159% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 13.8261648746 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 55.0 43.0788530466 128% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.0752688172 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2132.0 1977.66487455 108% => OK
No of words: 451.0 407.700716846 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72727272727 4.8611393121 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.60833598836 4.48103885553 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67904283558 2.67179642975 100% => OK
Unique words: 213.0 212.727598566 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472283813747 0.524837075471 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 696.6 618.680645161 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 13.0 9.59856630824 135% => OK
Article: 4.0 3.08781362007 130% => OK
Subordination: 9.0 3.51792114695 256% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.6003584229 102% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.1344086022 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.8908477155 48.9658058833 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.523809524 100.406767564 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4761904762 20.6045352989 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.71428571429 5.45110844103 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297786745626 0.236089414692 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0881200691154 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0761709995373 0.0737576698707 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16549939246 0.150856017488 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514871360874 0.0645574589148 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 58.1214874552 101% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.1575268817 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.15 10.9000537634 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.01818996416 100% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 86.8835125448 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 10.002688172 140% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.0537634409 103% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.