The chart and graph below give information about participants who have entered the Olympics since it began.
Summaries the information by selecting and reporting on the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
Both charts showed the data of accomplices who participated in the Olympic games since 1924 to 2012.
The bar chart compared the quantity of male and female atheles involed in the Olympics from 1924 to 2012. The line graph, meanwhile, showed the highest figure of contestans during four periods.
According to the chart, it is easily to accept that men took part in the Olympics were always higher than women. Since 1924, men significantly reached a peak of 1,000 people per year, which achieved the highest value with 6,000 contestants in 2012. Whislt, the number of female participants increased steadily to 1984, to 1,500 people, and witnessed a dramatic rocket to approximately 5,000 members until 2012.
The line graph, on the other hands, had quite the same trend as the bar graph. Since 1924, the amount of accomplices had gradually risen by 2,000 people in 60 years, and climbed quickly more 3,000 members in 2012. This data had tripled compare with in 1924.
In conclusion, both charts showed datas the Olympics athele numbers during four periods. There was a big change between male and female participants, especially in women, while most partakers took part in the Olympics in 2012.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-05 | WindOlivia | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-05 | WindOlivia | 78 | view |
- The maps below show how Science Park has changed from 2008 until now 84
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 78
- The map below shows the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development 78
- Some countries are struggling with increases in crime rates Some believe that having more police on the streets is best way to reduce and combat crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a had tripled compare with in 1924. In conclusion, both charts showed datas ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, while, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1010.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07537688442 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51523476018 2.65546596893 95% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 106.607317073 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603015075377 0.547539520022 110% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7721745302 43.030603864 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.8181818182 112.824112599 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.90909090909 5.23603664747 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.09268292683 195% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.103014988633 0.215688989381 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459102052327 0.103423049105 44% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0396469880012 0.0843802449381 47% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0735242635703 0.15604864568 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418657935719 0.0819641961636 51% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 70.13 61.2550243902 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.9 10.3012195122 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.89 11.4140731707 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.