19.3.2022: Some people believe that schools should teach forgeign languages for primary school children. Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantage?
In the globalized educational and business environments, there are various primary schools that tend to teach other languages besides their mother tongue in their curriculum. Despite this phenomenon may raise concerns, I am of the opinion that this development is generally more favorable.
On the one hand, several reasons explain the negative sides of a dramatic increase in the learning of foreign languages. First of all, it relates to the lack of a healthy lifestyle when students only sit down in front of the table and spend hours learning and using computers or smartphones. Therefore, kids do not have enough time to play which affects their both mental and physical health, or the opportunity to be part of a community. Moreover, many parents only know for themselves and ignore their children's thoughts and desires. They are too expected of kids and comparing their abilities with other people put invisible pressure on children.
On the other hand, I would argue that teaching foreign languages to primary school students is more beneficial in terms of developing themselves and their chances in the future. Firstly, children can gain more knowledge about diverse and unique cultures and develop an awareness of other exotic people. As a result, it stimulates their curiosity and exploration which are essential in the integration society nowadays. In addition, foreign languages are undoubtedly a crucial tool to open more job opportunities. Many companies tend to recruit those who possess expert language skills so that children will have chances to work in various fields such as interpretation, diplomacy, aviation, etc.
To sum up, being bilingual is the most precious gift that your parents may give to you. Nevertheless, you will be able to move easily in the world and make friends with people on the opposite side of the planet.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-05 | giangngoc | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-08 | giangngoc | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Tran Bi | 56 | view |
| 2022-09-23 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-08-16 | unknownabc | 61 | view |
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- The graph below shows consumers average annual expenditure on cell phone national and international fixed line and services in America between 2001 and 2010 67
- The diagram below shows how to recycle organic waste to produce fertilizer compost 78
- The diagrams below shows one method of manufacturing ceramic pots 61
- The diagram shows changes in Felistone in the UL between 1967 and 2001 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, if, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, therefore, in addition, such as, as a result, first of all, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1555.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20066889632 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82620767192 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.628762541806 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 486.9 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.645356238 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.071428571 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3571428571 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7142857143 7.06120827912 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.156411071213 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0470915136631 0.084324248473 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0475423615 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0884750966778 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515344324334 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 78.4519038076 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.