Some people think that it is more beneficial to take part in sports which are played in teams, like football, while other people think that taking part in individual sports is bteer, like tennis or swimming. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Admittedly, sport is an activity that can challenge the human body. Some people advocate that it is ideal to take part in individual games like tennis or swimming is better, while I still believe that team sports are more beneficial.
On the one hand, various reasons explain why people can benefit when participating in individual sports. The first reason relates to independence, individual sports instill higher levels of self-reliance, discipline, and passion in athletes. Therefore, winning or losing is entirely up to you, and every competition is a chance to beat your personal best. Your success and your failure are entirely your own. Moreover, if you have team sports, you can suffer from several pressures. For instance, the schedule has been often fixed training which can interrupt members' preparation to take part. In contrast, you play personal activities, the schedule can be flexibly changed based on the nature of work without having to depend on others.
On the other hand, playing physical activities in a group is better, rather than in singles group games. Firstly, team sports foster a sense of belonging and a sense of respect for both mates and opponents. As a result, learning team spirit makes us more adequate members of society and support each other. In addition, members can help you improve your weakness to get over your shyness and achieve a common goal, thanks to their support. For example, if you are hard to communicate and interact with people, the teams can help you be more confident and get along with others.
In conclusion, while individual sports can bring certain benefits, I believe people should devote more of their spare time to playing team sports.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-13 | Mayuresh0809 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 61 | view |
| 2023-07-23 | minhphambinh1234 | 67 | view |
| 2023-03-20 | TLan168 | 67 | view |
- 14 2 2019 and 20 8 2022 The table below presents the food consumption per person weekly in a European country in 1992 2002 and 2012 78
- Cam 17 test 3 The chart below gives information about how families in one country spent their wekkly income in 1968 abd in 2018
- The charts below give information on the ages of the populations of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections for 2050 78
- 18 6 2016 Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 84
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 235, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e that team sports are more beneficial. On the one hand, various reasons explain...
^^^
Line 2, column 511, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[8]
Message: The adverb 'often' is usually put between 'has' and 'been'.
Suggestion: has often been
...l pressures. For instance, the schedule has been often fixed training which can interrupt memb...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 230, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to team'
Suggestion: to team
...es and opponents. As a result, learning team spirit makes us more adequate members o...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1423.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 280.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08214285714 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63490841339 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 440.1 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6547803051 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.8666666667 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4666666667 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.280952112198 0.244688304435 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.090109107239 0.084324248473 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102097282574 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.203288833272 0.151304729494 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.106384338339 0.056905535591 187% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.87 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.