In some countries, many more people are choosing to live alone nowadays than in the past. Do you think a positive or negative development.
It is true that living independently is becoming rapidly prevalent in present-day society. Although there are some perks of this trend, I ponder it to be a drawbacks development overall.
The main benefit of this phenomenon is that some people who opt to live alone may become more independent than those who live with their families. It has demonstrated that they could cook, clean, or manage time and money by themself. Furthermore, people can look after others as well as themself as got ill from their self-experience. All of which are valuable life skills. Therefore, an increase in the number of individuals can be seen as a positive development.
Despite the benefits mentioned above, I assess that this is a negative trend for various reasons. The first one is that people who live apart from family members frequently felling loneliness, stress, and worries. This is because people don't see relatives face to face and receive support about positive emotions from them as in previous days. In addition, from the financial point of view, the people who live alone have to face costly bills for house rent, daily food, and shopping in city life. This means that if they don't have the ability to cover their basic need they would negatively think and effortlessly give up. For instance, nowadays, there are many students who have been working a part-time job with a salary almost equal to house rent. Thus, extremely challenging to live without guarders
In conclusion, while I recognize the advantages of this development, I believe that the disadvantages are more significant.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-09 | jadenguyen | 61 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | jadenguyen | 61 | view |
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004 73
- The chart shows the hours per week spent watching TV by gender and by age group in 2011 in Australia Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparation where relevant 78
- The diagram gives information about the process of making carbonated drinks
- The graph below shows the population of Chile by age group between 1975 and 2035 85
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can governments do to address these problems 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'drawbacks'' or 'drawback's'?
Suggestion: drawbacks'; drawback's
...erks of this trend, I ponder it to be a drawbacks development overall. The main benefi...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 238, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ss, and worries. This is because people dont see relatives face to face and receive ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 523, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...g in city life. This means that if they dont have the ability to cover their basic n...
^^^^
Line 5, column 781, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'living'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'challenge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: living
...house rent. Thus, extremely challenging to live without guarders In conclusion, whil...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, look, may, so, therefore, thus, well, while, apart from, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1331.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08015267176 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80994066907 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.637404580153 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 423.0 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.5896607027 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.0714285714 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.7142857143 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.3571428571 7.06120827912 147% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.204823934366 0.244688304435 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585789455234 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0488896525346 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105434468638 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437403347061 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.39 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.