Some people believe that the Earth is being harmed (damaged) by human activities. Others feel that human actions make the Earth a better place to live. What is your opinion? Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Unquestionably, the Earth is being harmed by human activity, and one of the pressing problems facing our Earth today is climate change.
First of all, there are too many cars and factories now, both of which cause serious air pollution. In my country, the autumn and winter air becomes extraordinarily awful. The air quality deteriorates and the smog makes it difficult to breathe. Hence, many people have contracted asthma and severe allergies are commonplace. In addition, because of the surge in greenhouse gasses like CO2 in recent decades, the temperature is higher than that in the past. The effects of this climate change and severe weather fluctuations are apparent. Last year in my country, some places started snowing, which surprised all of us. This strange phenomenon is the consequence of human activities on earth. There is little doubt that immediate action is required to produce more eco-friendly technology such as alternative energies and emissions-free vehicles. The ample evidence presented enables us to reasonably conclude that human food production has a massive negative impact on the ecosystem.
Take for instance the elevated consumption of beef. Cows raised for agricultural use produce high amounts of methane gas, which is a major contributing factor to global warming. Moreover, rainforests are often clear-cut to make more space for cattle farming, thereby reducing the amount of beneficial foliage. The resulting floods, storms and droughts have taken a toll, causing tens of thousands of deaths. In addition to clear-cutting and burning trees for economic benefit, we also have hunted many species to extinction. Human impact on animal populations has been drastic, done simply to boost the economy.
Although humans have made extraordinary leaps in technological advancement, it has not kept up with the destruction humans have caused to Mother Nature. I recently read a newspaper article on the destruction of seabeds and the disappearance of coral reefs. The deplorable problem of overfishing has also aroused public concern. Furthermore, countries are dumping their garbage into the oceans. In addition, offshore drilling for oil and gas has resulted in oil leaks and noise pollution. The catastrophic consequence is hundreds of whales beaching themselves. We should nurture a sense of responsibility and become better stewards of the environment. We have the technological means to mitigate our environmental impact, so we must try to find a way which is beneficial for both humans and the Earth. We mustn’t lose sight of the fact that we’ve only got one planet, and we need to interact with it in a better way
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2022-10-10 | porteghale Abi | 90 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 801, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...neficial for both humans and the Earth. We mustn’t lose sight of the fact that we’...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32619047619 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03320531239 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7146438507 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0384615385 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1538461538 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15652385794 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357839143365 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545910049992 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107762404951 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061839375992 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 801, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...neficial for both humans and the Earth. We mustn’t lose sight of the fact that we’...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, so, for instance, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 15.1003584229 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 9.8082437276 31% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.0286738351 73% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 43.0788530466 58% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 52.1666666667 100% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.0752688172 211% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2237.0 1977.66487455 113% => OK
No of words: 420.0 407.700716846 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32619047619 4.8611393121 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.48103885553 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03320531239 2.67179642975 114% => OK
Unique words: 260.0 212.727598566 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619047619048 0.524837075471 118% => OK
syllable_count: 707.4 618.680645161 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 9.0 3.08781362007 291% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 3.51792114695 57% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.86738351254 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6003584229 126% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.1344086022 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.7146438507 48.9658058833 61% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.0384615385 100.406767564 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1538461538 20.6045352989 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.45110844103 73% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.85842293907 363% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15652385794 0.236089414692 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0357839143365 0.076458572812 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545910049992 0.0737576698707 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107762404951 0.150856017488 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.061839375992 0.0645574589148 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 58.1214874552 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.1575268817 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.01818996416 119% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 86.8835125448 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.002688172 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.0537634409 84% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 90.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 27.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.