It is true that art does play a crucial role in almost every culture worldwide. Nevertheless, nowadays, an increasing number of individuals look down on art and they tend to be more concerned about scientific investigations, technological advancements, and economic growth. There are several reasons behind this phenomenon and several solutions should be adopted by the government to improve the situation.
To commence with, there are two fundamental reasons why art has been increasingly obliviated in this modern world. First and foremost, art subjects are not emphasized at schools or even abolished from some high schools' academic curriculums. For example, in Vietnam, art-related subjects are only taught in elementary schools while secondary school students will not have art in their learning programs. Moreover, many people claim that art has no relevant relationship to their professions so they do not pay much attention to it. For instance, due to the development of ever-advancing technology in this modern era, in every country, a large number of employees work as scientists, engineers, businessmen, and so on. Therefore, they do not need to acquire art-related knowledge to serve their jobs, leading to the prevalence of art oblivion in almost every society in the world.
Fortunately, several measures could be taken to alleviate this problem. The first solution should be the addition of art subjects in all schools ranging from primary to high schools. This adjustment by the government would have positive effects on students’ art acquisition as well as enhance their creativity. Furthermore, the promotion of museums and art galleries is also an effective measure. As individuals can pay a visit to these destinations to enjoy pieces of both international and domestic arts as a way to entertain after their working hours. In addition, museums and art galleries are also ideal places to educate young children about the beauty of the cultures of their countries through magnificent paintings about the history and cultural values.
In conclusion, the discouragement of art subjects at schools and its irrelevant connection with the majority of people’s careers these days have contributed to the neglect of artworks support. Therefore, several steps like facilitating art-related subjects at schools and investing in museums and art galleries need to be taken to combat the problem.
- The maps show the change of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The following chart show the results of a British survey taken in 2009 related to housing preferences of UK people 84
- Many people say the gap between the rich and the poor people is wider as rich people become richer poor people become poorer What problems could this situation cause and what measures can be done to address these problems 73
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems to increase the costs of fuels Do you agree or disagree 78
- Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems Identify one or two serious ones and suggest ways that governments and individuals can tackle these problems 73
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...y in this modern era, in every country, a large number of employees work as scientists, engineers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 765, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about the history and cultural values. In conclusion, the discouragement of art...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49597855228 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12828082492 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56836461126 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1821113946 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.588235294 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4705882353 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246037138032 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837712294563 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321705502284 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153778568379 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232472030022 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 636, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...y in this modern era, in every country, a large number of employees work as scientists, engineers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 765, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... about the history and cultural values. In conclusion, the discouragement of art...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, look, moreover, nevertheless, second, so, therefore, well, while, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2050.0 1615.20841683 127% => OK
No of words: 373.0 315.596192385 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49597855228 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20363070211 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12828082492 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56836461126 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1821113946 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.588235294 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9411764706 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4705882353 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.246037138032 0.244688304435 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0837712294563 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0321705502284 0.0667982634062 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153778568379 0.151304729494 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232472030022 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.