In many ways media desperately visualize the concepts of happiness lies in consuming great products which biases people to have ecstatic products.
The affinity to have famous brands in choosing clothes, car and other item are rising. People love to purchase popular brands due to multiple reasons like social status symbol, peer pressure, corporate manipulation or media portrayal. Although there has some gain for a few parties but I think the fondness to have famous brand is not a good development.
Buying fancy items in daily life has become a social status symbol nowadays. People want to show off his/her lifestyle in social media where peer member comments on it. If the belongings are widely known and luxurious items, then the community people get an idea about how rich or elite the person owing it. This types of display sometimes encourages others to use the similar types of luxury branded goods.
On the other hand, media is playing a gigantic role to promote the idea of branding, as they broadcast different TV or serial where the celebrities are shown wearing costly items. Citizens unintentionally get the feeling about class or standard from the sophisticated portrayal of their favorite actress or models. In many ways media desperately visualize the concepts of happiness lies in consuming great products which biases people to have ecstatic products.
On the contrary, there is another side of the reason for having branded clothings or lifestyle items. In the current world, there are a lots of fake, imitated goods which makes consumers confused. People cannot trust an unknown or less popular item as it may deceive the buyer by vague advertisement. So that natives love to purchase a well-known items even if it is costly to avoid the risk of buying fake items.
In a nutshell, People love to have branded clothes or necessary goods as it becomes a social status symbol, or due to peer pressure or sophisticated media portrayal. in facts, sometimes the famous brands are trusted about their quality of good. However, in a large scale the interest to have fancy branded products is not a positive development for society or for a country due to ill competition to consume better than the peer ones or to present oneself exclusively from in society as a symbol of luxury.
- In many ways media desperately visualize the concepts of happiness lies in consuming great products which biases people to have ecstatic products 78
- More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
- Topic More and more people want to buy famous brands with clothes cars and other items What are the reasons Do you think it is a positive or negative development 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 134, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... items. In the current world, there are a lots of fake, imitated goods which makes con...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 347, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'item'?
Suggestion: item
...t natives love to purchase a well-known items even if it is costly to avoid the risk ...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 166, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...ssure or sophisticated media portrayal. in facts, sometimes the famous brands are ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, then, well, i think, in fact, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1792.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 4.95027624309 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65103575958 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558011049724 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 578.7 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.9673468612 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.411764706 106.682146367 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2941176471 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.35294117647 7.06120827912 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.261810854656 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0882545544082 0.084324248473 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.21011534184 0.0667982634062 315% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147323819095 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.150099084006 0.056905535591 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.43 12.4159519038 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.91 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.