It is true that technology is, no doubt, the sole reason for shifting the way people communicate entirely to the next level, and it helps them interact with their beloved ones more easily and conveniently. It can be regarded as a positive development because our precious relationships never fade with the help of it.
With the advance of technology, there are fewer barriers between people even if they live in different continents or time zones. In other words, technology makes it easy to communicate with our family when we are studying or working abroad. Moreover, forgetting old friends because of losing connection is no longer the case at all as we can easily find our old friends on social media platforms and dig the good old memories back. Furthermore, making new friends and expanding our social circle is easier than ever before, especially for introverts, who are afraid of making conversation in person, since technology acts like a medium on which we can convey our thoughts and share our emotions with new people without feeling awkward.
There is a concrete reason why this has become a positive development. To make our friendships always fresh and alive, we need to keep in touch with our friends frequently. In the past, this was almost impossible because we had to wait over ten days even to get a short letter. However, in this technology-driven world, everything we can imagine to do in person could be done online, from playing games together with our squad or having a movie night with our best friends to going shopping together in a virtual world.
In conclusion, technology makes interaction easier, which, in turn, strengthens our relationships and widens our networks of friends, so these things are pointing out that it is a definitely positive development.
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- The graph and table below show the number of fishers in millions for different regions in 1980 1990 and 2000 and the world s top exporters of fish in 2000 84
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 339, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'imagine doing'.
Suggestion: imagine doing
...hnology-driven world, everything we can imagine to do in person could be done online, from pl...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, in conclusion, no doubt, in other words, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 41.998997996 107% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02341137124 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.852468344 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61872909699 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 506.74238477 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.5169876379 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.545454545 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.81818181818 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.224712068659 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092048592994 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0477018707813 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.147233729757 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0496090596028 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 78.4519038076 85% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.