The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain. The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods. Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below.
The bar chart presents how different income groups spent their money on hamburgers, fish and chips and pizza in the UK in 1990. The line graph compares the consumption pattern, in gram person, of those foods from 1970 to 1990.
Overall, the high income group spent significantly more money than the other groups on these food items. While there was an upward trend in consuming hamburgers and fish and chips, it was the opposite for pizza.
The expenditure of the high income people on hamburgers was around 42 pence per person, compared with 32 pence for average income group. Moreover, fish and chips were paid out the most by the average income group, and the smallest amount of money spent on pizza was made by the low income group, at just more than 5 pence.
In 1970, the figure for hamburger was under 50 grams, while those for fish and chips and pizza were 90 grams and 300 grams respectively. However, by 1990, whereas fish and chips and hamburger consumption had increased sharply, there had been a decrease of nearly 100 grams in pizza consumption.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-25 | dangcongkhai10082005 | 78 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | dangcongkhai10082005 | 56 | view |
| 2022-10-25 | dangcongkhai10082005 | 78 | view |
| 2021-12-17 | Sukh-73 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-26 | pris | 11 | view |
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 56
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- The charts below show reasons for travel and the main issues for the travelling public in the US in 2009 89
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast food in Britain The graph shows the trends in the consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 78
- The diagrams below are existing and proposed floor plans for the redevelopment of an art gallery 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, moreover, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 6.8 162% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 886.0 965.302439024 92% => OK
No of words: 185.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78918918919 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37761658562 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.562162162162 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6153829414 43.030603864 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.75 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111807942655 0.215688989381 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0587294679834 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0294477991344 0.0843802449381 35% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.080226416564 0.15604864568 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0358347907496 0.0819641961636 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.2329268293 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.8 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 40.7170731707 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.