Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
History and knowledge about past events are the most important pillars of each society in today's world. While we live in a fast-paced and chaotic world, a study of the culture and art of each country can give us plenty of information about our roots in the past. A controversial question that is often raised regarding this issue is whether visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country. Some people possess the conviction that this point is agreeable whereas others hold exactly the opposite and allege that there are many ways to know and get information about a country rather than visiting museums. I am personally content that this issue is multifaceted. Although technology helps us to have an easier life, there are many facts that are buried in these inventions. I'd rather continue with the first approach. To substantiate my point of view, the following paragraphs represent a cursory glance at the most outstanding reasons.
The first reason coming to mind elucidating my standpoint is that museums have a lot of information about our ancient history. When we visit these places we can read or listen to the tour leader of those and learn more about the past. There are many museums that consist of different parts of history, like wars that occurred in the country, ancient people's shields and clothes, and even sports. Consider my personal experience to make this point more clear. When I was a child, I traveled abroad and go to their national museum. It was a big place in Paris, the Louvre Museum, that consists of several paintings and artworks even status. It was a pleasant experience.
The second rationale reason behind this opinion is rooted in the fact that visiting museums is a more amusable and better way to understand history rather than taking a history course. I think children who have difficulty with history lessen and get boring classes, have fruitful experiences in visiting museums and learning about the past.
In brief, due to the aforementioned reasons, I agree with this statement that visiting museums is the best way to learn about a country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-10 | KimiaKermanshahian | 90 | view |
| 2022-11-05 | porteghale Abiasli | 80 | view |
| 2022-09-13 | madgal | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-11 | Hoda95 | 73 | view |
| 2022-08-22 | mrhj75 | 90 | view |
- Some people like to keep a record of their own experiences by uploading pictures and other information to social networking sites Other people prefer not to create such records Which approach do you prefer and why Use specific reasons and examples to supp 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the statement People will spend less time cooking and preparing food in twenty years 70
- TPO 50 integrated writing
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Governments should spend more money in support of the arts than in support of athletics such as state sponsored Olympic teams Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement If you do not make sure other people especially influential people or your employers know about your strengths and accomplishments you will never get successful in life 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 784, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
...ts that are buried in these inventions. Id rather continue with the first approach...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, regarding, second, so, whereas, while, i think, in brief
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 9.8082437276 20% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 13.8261648746 101% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.0286738351 127% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 52.1666666667 96% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.0752688172 99% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1744.0 1977.66487455 88% => OK
No of words: 355.0 407.700716846 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91267605634 4.8611393121 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6255213631 2.67179642975 98% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 212.727598566 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.532394366197 0.524837075471 101% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 618.680645161 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.51630824373 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 9.59856630824 73% => OK
Article: 6.0 3.08781362007 194% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.86738351254 54% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.94265232975 61% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6003584229 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.1344086022 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4330070596 48.9658058833 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.8888888889 100.406767564 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.6045352989 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.72222222222 5.45110844103 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8709677419 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.88709677419 123% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.249857238979 0.236089414692 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737833469143 0.076458572812 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843751318288 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191821971662 0.150856017488 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0913122574156 0.0645574589148 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 11.7677419355 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 58.1214874552 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.1575268817 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 10.9000537634 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.01818996416 103% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 86.8835125448 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 10.002688172 135% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.0537634409 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.247311828 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.