The chart below shows the amount of leisure time enjoyed by men and women of different employment status.
The bar charts elucidate the amount of time spent on leisure per week by sex and employment status between 1998 and 1999.
Unemployed and retired people showed the longest period for leisure activity per week than any other employment status. Unemployed and retired males enjoyed bit more time on the leisure activities than females. Men without jobs had used about 80 hours a week on the other activities, while jobless women spent just under 80 hours a week.
Interestingly, housewives and part-timers are only recorded for females' leisure time and they enjoyed their leisure about 40 and 50 hours, respectively. Full time positions, on the other hand, men and women could afford to enjoy about 40 hours a week for the relaxation (about 42% for male and 38% for female).
It is apparent that, the unemployed and retired men and women had more leisure time than any other types of people. The graph reflects that, male enjoy more leisure time than woman and employed people had less time for leisure activity than retired and unemployed people.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-01-20 | RAYHAN MAHMUD | 61 | view |
2020-01-09 | Shivam7090 | 67 | view |
2020-01-09 | Shivam7090 | 67 | view |
2019-12-18 | ahmadrava88 | 89 | view |
2019-12-12 | rohitbangari27@gmail.com | 73 | view |
- The line graph below shows changes in the amount and type of fast food consumed by Australian teenagers from 1975 to 2000. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 35
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. 60
- The diagram below shows the number of houses built per year in two cities Derby and Nottingham Between 2000 and 2009 71
- The table below shows the worldwide market share of the notebook computer market for manufacturers in the years 2006 and 2007. 50
- The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 88
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.5 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 8 10
No. of Words: 176 200
No. of Characters: 848 1000
No. of Different Words: 87 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.642 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.818 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.353 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 53 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 41 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 21 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 15 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 22 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 4.444 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.25 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.527 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.769 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.204 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4