It is argued that the opportunity to attend tertiary education is equal for every individual and that the government should provide free education for all students irrespective of their financial capacity. While this suggestion might be beneficial for students coming from low-income families, I maintain that it will put a heavier burden on the national budget and negatively affect students' attitudes toward study.
On the one hand, the idea of supplying free higher education is reasonable to some extent. It is undeniable that an exemption to tuition fees means that people from lower socioeconomic backgrounds can have a chance to pursue university. As the price of taking a course at university is relatively costly nowadays, many impoverished students can not afford these costs and they have to drop out of school to begin their working life. Therefore, with financial support from the government in terms of tuition fees, these students can continue their studies and have more opportunities to secure a variety of well-paid jobs after graduating from university.
On the other hand, there are several reasons why the provision of free university fees will adversely influence the state budget and students’ learning attitude. The first reason is that in order to supply education without charge for every individual,it requires a huge amount of money. As a result, it will put a strain on the national fund, and a variety of essential aspects that need government investment will be delayed. The second reason involves the degradation in students’ determination towards their studying. This is because it costs students nothing to retake a failed subject at university, they will take it for granted and do not pay attention to academic outcomes.
In conclusion, although the exemption of university learning costs regardless of students’ financial conditions will do wonders for disadvantaged students, I contend that the problems resulting from this phenomenon should also not be ignored. In my view, it is a better option for the government to financially support university students according to their financial circumstances.
- The maps show the change of an office building between the present and the future Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram shows how rainwater is collected for the use of drinking water in an Australian towns 84
- The maps below show changes to the ground floor plan of a university department in 2000 and 2015 78
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents 73
- The infographics below show employment statistics for UK residents by English language proficiency in 2013 57
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fect students attitudes toward study. On the one hand, the idea of supplying f...
^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...obs after graduating from university. On the other hand, there are several rea...
^^^
Line 5, column 252, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , it
...tion without charge for every individual,it requires a huge amount of money. As a r...
^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...t pay attention to academic outcomes. In conclusion, although the exemption of...
^^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ding to their financial circumstances.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore, well, while, in conclusion, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44776119403 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02940809942 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.546268656716 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 569.7 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 46.2376162855 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.384615385 106.682146367 132% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7692307692 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.46153846154 7.06120827912 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.253304557179 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917389431381 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0514909458634 0.0667982634062 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158399898812 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0306435821314 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.63 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.26 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.78957915832 163% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.