The chart shows the sales of five different kinds of jam from 2009 to 2014
The line charts above representate the number of sales various jellies in the last five years exactly from 2009 to 2014. It is explained in million units.
Overall, the graph rose dramatically not only in strawberry, but also in grape, so the selling go up in every year. Instead, plum fell constanly in the last five years.
According to the data, in 2009 to 2011, the highly number for selling jam stood at strawberry and grape, it were around 1,5 million units comparable raspberry was about 1 million units in two years. Otherwise, there was no increase in cherry because the sale rose in the first year but decreased at the same amount in the next year. However, the lower drop was plum, approximately 0,5 million units every year.
Then in 2011 to 2014, the top sales were as yet same before, strawbery and grape, which around 2,5 million units equally raspberry reached about 1,5 million units in the first year and it was up around 0,5 million units in the last two years. Similarly, cherry was mounted approximately 1 million units in the two initial years and hit a low steadily around 0,5 in the last year, likewise plum dropped sharply 1,5 million units in three years.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-08 | đặng thu hương | 10 | view |
- The line charts above representate the number of Australian coming out to Japan US China and India for the last twenty two years specifically from 1990 to 2012 It is measured in percentage 56
- The maps below represent the development in the Norbiton in the future 11
- The pie chart show the destination of export goods in three countries in 2010 56
- The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years
- The chart and table show the exports earnings and percentage change in values in 2015 and 2016 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 141, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
...y from 2009 to 2014. It is explained in million units. Overall, the graph rose dramati...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, likewise, similarly, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 979.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 208.0 196.424390244 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.70673076923 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79765784423 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37991452752 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519230769231 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 291.6 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 67.2507744689 43.030603864 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.777777778 112.824112599 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.22222222222 5.23603664747 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114106418368 0.215688989381 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0609099322991 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0987978830076 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.10574747123 0.15604864568 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109943771024 0.0819641961636 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.51 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.