The first line chart compares the proportion of residences containing three particular appliances from 1920 to 2019 and the second one describes the hours of household work per week in that time in each home.
Generally speaking, the accommodations containing refrigerators and vacuum cleaners increased in the given period while the digit of households having a washing machine remained constant after a gentle increase in the first three years.
Turning to the first line chart, In 1920, about 40% of houses had a washing machine followed by the figure for vacuum cleaners at almost 30%. Although in the opening year no residence had refrigerators, this figure exhibited rapid growth to reach a peak in 1980 and stayed constant afterward. Having a vacuum cleaner also became a very common appliance in the given period as it significantly rose to 100% in 2000. In the last ten years, every accommodation in the country had a vacuum cleaner and a refrigerator. In spite of a gradual growth to 70% till 1960, the number of houses having washing machines stayed under 75% until 2019.
A glance at the second line chart reveals that, In 1920, the number of housework per week in each residence was the highest at 50%. However, this trend declined drastically to about 10% in 1980 and remained stable over the given time except for a slight dip in 2019.
- he charts below show the changes in ownership of electrical appliances and amount of time spent doing housework and households in one country between 1920 and 2019 78
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles 78
- The graph and pie chart below give information on in house training courses in a large financial company Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Present a written argument or case to an educated non specialist audience on the following topic Some employers reward members of staff for their exceptional contribution to the company by giving them extra money This practice can act as an incentive for 78
- Nowadays more people prefer to communicate via text message and email instead of face to face Why do you think this is the best way When is face to face communication necessary 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, second, so, while, except for, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.0 14% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1131.0 965.302439024 117% => OK
No of words: 229.0 196.424390244 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93886462882 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72225827373 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 106.607317073 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558951965066 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 332.1 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.0179268032 43.030603864 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.666666667 112.824112599 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4444444444 22.9334400587 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141660520416 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0577834064002 0.103423049105 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545778321557 0.0843802449381 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0965919503488 0.15604864568 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0653744507079 0.0819641961636 80% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.67 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.06136585366 99% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 40.7170731707 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.