The reading and the lecture are both about influences of smart cars on our life. The author of reading feels advantages of these cars. The lecturer challanges the claims made by the author. She is of the opinion that these theories are falce.
To begin with, the author argues that with help of sensors smart cars can prevent accidents by determining location of other cars accurately. That is why, this technology saves people’s lives and make safer travels. This specific arguement is challanged by the lecturer. She mentions that sometimes these detectors does not work aptly, especially when there are plenty of cars in the road, it would hard to detect correctly, and cause to some errors, which could results accidents.
Secondly, the writer suggests that expanding use of smart cars will increase speed of cars and makes travels quicker. Because they can detect other automobiles, they would be able to increase their speed safely and appropriately. The lecturer, however, rebuts it by mentioning that the people who drive a car will be higher, because of easier to drive these cars. Therefore, number of cars could get increase in the path, which generate an obstacle for smart car to run with higher speed.
Finally, the author posits that drivers will need to repair their cars due to less numbers of accidents. This reduces money that buying new equipments to replace parts of cars and restorating cars. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is because equipments of smart cars are made with high technology, as expected they are more expensive than part of traditional cars as well. This statement made by the writer soes not illustrate reality by lecturer’s opinion.
- Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B C This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood fr 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more influenced by their teachers than by their friends Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 76
- Humans have been battling the tropical disease malaria since at least the late fourth century B C This debilitating and deadly disease is actually a parasite which reproduces in humans and is spread through the saliva of mosquitoes when they suck blood fr 3
- What do you think is the best way for the government of your country to improve the environment Increase public transportation Reduce the construction of new factories Build more parks 83
- In the United States it had been common practice since the late1960s no to suppress natural forest fires The let it burn policy assumed that forest fire would burn themselves out quickly without causing much damage However in the summer of 1988 forest fir 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 136, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...reading feels advantages of these cars. The lecturer challanges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 2, column 107, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ars can prevent accidents by determining location of other cars accurately. That ...
^^
Line 2, column 465, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[2]
Message: The verb 'could' requires the base form of the verb: 'result'
Suggestion: result
..., and cause to some errors, which could results accidents. Secondly, the writer sugges...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 79, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun numbers is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...s will need to repair their cars due to less numbers of accidents. This reduces mone...
^^^^
Line 4, column 198, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ace parts of cars and restorating cars. In contrast, the lecturer’s position is ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.4613686534 105% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 5.04856512141 198% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 30.3222958057 129% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1410.0 1373.03311258 103% => OK
No of words: 278.0 270.72406181 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07194244604 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59169603924 2.5805825403 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 145.348785872 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.568345323741 0.540411800872 105% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 419.366225166 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 3.25607064018 276% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 13.0662251656 122% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 21.2450331126 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7942780247 49.2860985944 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.125 110.228320801 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.375 21.698381199 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.75 7.06452816374 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 4.33554083885 208% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.27373068433 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262503976074 0.272083759551 96% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799528812824 0.0996497079465 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0727317509783 0.0662205650399 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15164759887 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638014686479 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.3589403974 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 62.68 53.8541721854 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 11.0289183223 79% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 12.2367328918 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.42419426049 103% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 63.6247240618 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 10.7273730684 56% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.498013245 84% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.