The city council of Town X has proposed reducing the city’s electric expenses by switching all the lights in public buildings from incandescent bulbs to light-emitting diodes (LEDs). The switch would be made gradually as the old incandescent bulbs burn out, and the city council reasons that since LED lights burn brighter and cost no more to purchase, the switch would help Town X save money on electrical costs in the future.
Write a response in which you discuss what questions would need to be answered to help evaluate the efficacy of the city council’s proposal to save money on electrical costs. Be sure to explain how the answers to these questions would help to evaluate the council’s prediction.
When making a decision, it is essential to gather as many details as possible before evaluating the proposal. The idea proposed by the city council of Town X is a reasonable one. However, there are some questions that need to be answered in order to evaluate the efficacy of the proposal.
First of all, the city council proposed that switching all lights from incandescent bulbs to light-emitting diodes (LEDs) would reduce the city’s electric expenses. One of the reasons being that LED lights burn brighter and cost no more to purchase. While it is true that if LED lights burn brighter than incandescent bulbs, Town X would need less LED lights installed in public buildings. The question that needs to be answered here is does LED lights last longer than incandescent bulbs? If the answer to this question is yes, then it helps strengthen the argument that Town X would be able to save money on electrical costs in the future since the need to replace them would not be as frequent. On the other hand, if the LED lights do not last longer than incandescent bulbs, then the proposal may be weakened in this case since Town X would have to switch out the light bulbs more often. Although it cost no more to purchase, the increased frequency of light bulbs replacement will not help Town X save money on electric expenses.
Secondly, another important question to raise is how much of the electric expenses will be reduced if Town X moves forward with the city council’s proposal of switching from incandescent bulbs to LED lights? The answer can be represented in a precise amount or a percentage. The important thing to understand here is how much money can Town X save on electrical costs if this proposal is redeemed valid. If the amount or percentage is high, then it would raise the efficacy of the proposal. And the opposite, if the amount or percentage is low, then the efficacy of the proposal would not be very significant. In order to reach the final decision, it is essential to understand and compare data and numbers in order to have better insights and analysis.
In conclusion, it is important for the city council to provide more information on the longevity of the LED lights and how much money Town X would be able to save in the future to evaluate the proposal.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-10 | Wednesday_Addams | 58 | view |
| 2023-01-30 | prabh450 | 60 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | writingishard | 60 | view |
| 2022-10-11 | Tanub922 | 70 | view |
| 2022-08-30 | harshalwaghmare | 60 | view |
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news During this time period most of the complain 50
- Young people should be encouraged to pursue long term realistic goals rather than seek immediate fame and recognition 54
- A nation should require all its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college rather than allow schools in different parts of the nation to determine which academic courses to offer 50
- Governments should invest as much in the arts as they do in the military Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In developing and support 50
- Schools should do more to prepare students for the non academic aspects of adulthood 50
Comments
e-rater score report
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.5 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 2 2
No. of Sentences: 17 15
No. of Words: 402 350
No. of Characters: 1846 1500
No. of Different Words: 160 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.478 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.592 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.59 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 117 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 91 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 77 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 23.647 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 8.443 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.588 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.372 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.541 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.119 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 5
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 962, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'bulbs'' or 'bulb's'?
Suggestion: bulbs'; bulb's
...chase, the increased frequency of light bulbs replacement will not help Town X save m...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, while, in conclusion, first of all, it is true, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 19.6327345309 117% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.9520958084 124% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 11.1786427146 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 13.6137724551 51% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 28.8173652695 59% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 55.5748502994 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 16.3942115768 37% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1897.0 2260.96107784 84% => OK
No of words: 402.0 441.139720559 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71890547264 5.12650576532 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47771567384 4.56307096286 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6819854519 2.78398813304 96% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 204.123752495 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.405472636816 0.468620217663 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 581.4 705.55239521 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.59920159681 88% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.96107784431 60% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.76447105788 68% => OK
Subordination: 7.0 2.70958083832 258% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.67365269461 60% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.22255489022 71% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 19.7664670659 86% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.8473053892 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.4451158781 57.8364921388 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.588235294 119.503703932 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6470588235 23.324526521 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 5.70786347227 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.15768463074 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.25449101796 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.20758483034 97% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 6.88822355289 29% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.67664670659 150% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.494445762692 0.218282227539 227% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169958856405 0.0743258471296 229% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172100093347 0.0701772020484 245% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.26471484416 0.128457276422 206% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.158277809054 0.0628817314937 252% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 14.3799401198 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 48.3550499002 135% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.1628742515 123% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 12.197005988 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.39 12.5979740519 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.25 8.32208582834 87% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 98.500998004 64% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 11.1389221557 101% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.