The given line graph illustrates clients' average spending on mobile phone, national and international land line services every year.
From basic observation, the number of mobile phone services and international fixed-line services improved remarkably. By contrast, the number of national fixed-line services witnessed a downward trend over the period shown.
Starting at $700, National fixed-line services was most popularly used, following by the international fixed-line services at about $250. The mobile phone cost the least at $200 in 2001. From 2001 to 2006, the price of national fixed-line services slipped steadily back to $500; However, there was a significant increase to the same point at $500 in the cell phone service. International land line services witnessed a slight growth in its price over the same period
In 2006, users of cell phone and national land line services had to pay the same amount of money for its services. After that cell phone services were more and more expensive until it reached a peak of nearly $750 over the last four years. Nevertheless, the opposite trend was true for national land line services at only $300 in the last year. The price of international fixed-line services experienced no change during the same period.
- The following pie chart shows the comparison of different kinds of energy production in France in two different years 23
- The diagram below shows how one type of coal is used to produce electricity Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Task 1 The table below shows the percentage of the population by age groups in one town who rode bicycles in 2011 73
- Some human activities have negative effects on plant and animal species Some people think it is too late to do anything about this problem while others think effective measures can be taken to improve this situation Discuss both views and give your opinio 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, nevertheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1061.0 965.302439024 110% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25247524752 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82511961744 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49504950495 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 333.0 283.868780488 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4713698887 43.030603864 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.1 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.5 5.23603664747 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 3.70975609756 189% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.535368568998 0.215688989381 248% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.263939573456 0.103423049105 255% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.254874512292 0.0843802449381 302% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.46202867218 0.15604864568 296% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.310694140587 0.0819641961636 379% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 61.2550243902 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.17 11.4140731707 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.36 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.