In the presented chart, information is shown on the quantity of paid and unpaid workers in 4 areas of sports of an Australian town in 2015.
In the presented chart, information is shown on the quantity of paid and unpaid workers in 4 areas of sports of an Australian town in 2015. Overall, volunteers take up most sections with a higher number of participants, coaching being the most favored among all.
Voluntary workers in the coaching section were the highest with around 73 people, in contrast, referees were the least popular only having half the number of participants. Following after, the second most chosen among volunteers were referees with nearly 60 workers. Finally are the therapists section with slightly less, under 50 people. It is obvious the distribution of volunteer workers across the chart is uneven, the opposite when comparing with paid participants where there was a less drastic difference in the amount of workers in each section. The figure for paid workers in other sections were nearly 50 people, which is also the highest figure. Second to this were coachers with around 45 participants. Lastly are paid therapists and refrees with only a minor difference, a little over 40 and the other slightly less than 40 accordingly.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-10 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make compa 73
- The table below shows the questionnaire about opinions of club members and general public for the new theatre in one town in 2012 78
- The chart shows the global sales of the top five mobile phone brands between 2009 and 2013 67
- The charts below show the percentage of male and female workers in country A and country B Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plan below shows the village of Pebbleton 20 years ago and now 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 268, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...s were referees with nearly 60 workers. Finally are the therapists section with slightl...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, finally, if, lastly, second, so, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 7.0 186% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 33.7804878049 101% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 935.0 965.302439024 97% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.13736263736 4.92477711251 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73818834296 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 106.0 106.607317073 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582417582418 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 276.3 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.3129451546 43.030603864 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.888888889 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2222222222 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.55555555556 5.23603664747 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.250302114978 0.215688989381 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.140479216277 0.103423049105 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.306580076906 0.0843802449381 363% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.305425627182 0.15604864568 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.226089938362 0.0819641961636 276% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 13.2329268293 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 61.2550243902 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.53 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.06136585366 107% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.